globetrotter
Stylish Dinosaur
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2004
- Messages
- 20,341
- Reaction score
- 423
got a kindle, love it. loaded like 200 books.
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
yeah i'm thinking of buying the DX, which is the larger version (9.7") for textbooks and such:
I go before girl's Kindle. She loves it. But, she's eying the iPad quite lasciviously.
kindle is for reading. Reading on an lcd screen is not pleasant over long periods of time. Apple is trying to sell it as an all-in-one device but for people that actually want to read more than a few pages at a time, a kindle is a far superior choice if that's what you're buying it for.
Be that as it may, I have a hard time justifying a Kindle purchase when the iPad is out there. The iPad can do so much more, and because it has a massive developer ecosystem, the basic feature set will be constantly improved at a rate much faster than a single company can make improvements.
Not an Apple fanboy here, so let's get that out of the way before someone inevitably accuses me of it.
I don't understand why apple fanboys get all pissy as soon as someone suggests that the latest device can't do everything as well as steve jobs says it can.
I had a DX for a week. It's too heavy to hold comfortably for a long time and if you were hoping to read documents full screen, the screen is just a touch too small
damn, really? what'd you end up doing with yours? wanna sell it?
damn, really? what'd you end up doing with yours? wanna sell it?
Listen, i'd happily consider an ipad for home/HT control and reading forums on the couch while i'm watching tv, or in the kitchen to watch video recipes on, but LCDs are **** for reading if you have to read for any length of time. The whole reason e-ink was developed was because pretty much everyone acknowledges that fact.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...445033542.htmlMeanwhile, the iPad uses back-lit liquid-crystal-display technology for its screen, which can light up in a dark room and is in color. Apple says the color iPad screen also uses a new display technology called "in-plane switching" to solve another common problem with LCD screens: the inability to see it from an angle. "You can hold it almost any way you want and still get a brilliant picture, with excellent color and contrast," claims Apple's product description.
So far, there's little scientific evidence about which screens are better for the eyes. Ophthalmologists say there isn't really much of a difference between how the eye works with either e-paper or back-lit screens. Neither could damage the eye and neither of these modern screens flicker like old-fashioned TVs.
Michael Marmor, a professor of ophthalmology at Stanford Medical School who has a Kindle at home, says neither technology offers inherent advantages. Reading with both kinds of screen could cause eyestrain because it has relatively little to do with the function of the eye, he says. Eyestrain is caused by placing too much stress on the brain and body by doing one thing for too long. The only solution for eyestrain is taking more regular breaks
I'm the farthest thing from an Apple fanboy, but a little genie called the WSJ brought to my attention a curious note: