Return of Gekko this month, or next?

The_Foxx · Mar 6, 2010

Cautiously optimistic, I'm more excited about this than the Indiana Jones movie! Let's hope it is better than the recent **** of Indy. wonder who did Shia's wardrobe?

I for one CANNOT ******* WAIT for this movie! have been talking about it for years, and looks like charlie sheen will make a brief appearance in the film? awesome.

I've seen release dates of March or April 23rd, not sure which is accurate?

0b5cur1ty · Mar 6, 2010

Squiggly red lines in 3, 2...

dragon8 · Mar 6, 2010

Comes out this month.

The_Foxx · Mar 6, 2010

that's great news-- wonder who made Shia's leather jacket (one of several in the film, looks like)

Cornellian · Mar 6, 2010

The_Foxx;3023563 said:
Cautiously optimistic, I'm more excited about this than the Indiana Jones movie! Let's hope it is better than the recent **** of Indy. wonder who did Shia's wardrobe?

I for one CANNOT ******* WAIT for this movie! have been talking about it for years, and looks like charlie sheen will make a brief appearance in the film? awesome.

I've seen release dates of March or April 23rd, not sure which is accurate?

+1

The_Foxx · Mar 6, 2010

the more i see/ read about this movie, the more I like it (except for the gucci loafers.....maybe).

The trailer is classic, especially claiming "one mobile phone" from his prison affects

Redwoood · Mar 6, 2010

I never really understood why he went to jail to begin with (evidence was weak to nonexistent).
But there must have been a murder conviction or two for him to stay in jail this long. Or am I missing something?

jamesbond · Mar 6, 2010

I'm a bit surprised by your optimism Fox. Thought you knew better, sequel's always fall short especially when it's a sequel to such a classic. Sure, it will be better viewing then "Valentine's day" or some stupid Seth Rogan film but I wouldn't get my hopes up. Shia's stuff looks awful.

alliswell · Mar 6, 2010

Originally Posted by The_Foxx

Coat's too short, lapels date it to August of 2008. Armholes are too low. Roping is too roped. Also divets. Shirt's an advertisement for tie space and spread collars. Tie's awful and the knot's too big. Who ties anything other than a FIH these days? Cuffs are both too large and too small. Shoes have a rubber sole. In short - an accurate representation of what a guy with too much money and not enough taste would wear. A+

jamesbond · Mar 6, 2010

Whats funny is thats not the worst we've seen of him. Thats probably one of his better looks from the stills.

I'll add to the "why does this guy keep getting starring rolls" crowd. He ruins movies, straight up!

The_Foxx · Mar 6, 2010

movies like Empire Strikes Back and IJ & Last crusade give me hope.

I think the style will evolve in the film, possibly with Gekko giving Shia's character some criticisms. in any event, i think it will be a good 'suit movie'

Originally Posted by jamesbond

I'm a bit surprised by your optimism Fox. Thought you knew better, sequel's always fall short especially when it's a sequel to such a classic. Sure, it will be better viewing then "Valentine's day" or some stupid Seth Rogan film but I wouldn't get my hopes up. Shia's stuff looks awful.

jamesbond · Mar 6, 2010

Originally Posted by The_Foxx

movies like Empire Strikes Back and IJ & Last crusade give me hope.

I think the style will evolve in the film, possibly with Gekko giving Shia's character some criticisms. in any event, i think it will be a good 'suit movie'

"And you can't come in here looking like that, go to Morty Sills, tell him I sent you"

fcuknu · Mar 6, 2010

Originally Posted by alliswell

Coat's too short, lapels date it to August of 2008. Armholes are too low. Roping is too roped. Also divets. Shirt's an advertisement for tie space and spread collars. Tie's awful and the knot's too big. Who ties anything other than a FIH these days? Cuffs are both too large and too small. Shoes have a rubber sole. In short - an accurate representation of what a guy with too much money and not enough taste would wear. A+

he is in motion, a lot of what you said is simply from the fact that he is moving

apropos · Mar 6, 2010

Originally Posted by fcuknu

he is in motion, a lot of what you said is simply from the fact that he is moving
It's actually most probably a simple dislike of Shia LeBouf (which is something I don't understand - you dislike a film star because of... what? why? You've never even met the guy!) or something else equally flaky masquerading as an objective criticism, so I really wouldn't give it the attention it seeks.

alliswell · Mar 6, 2010

Originally Posted by fcuknu

he is in motion, a lot of what you said is simply from the fact that he is moving

With respect, no. Unless movement changes:

Where his ass is... (Coat's too short)
What year it is... (lapels date it to August of 2008)
How big his arms are... (Armholes are too low)
The construction of the shoulder... (Roping is too roped).
OK, I'll concede this one for the sake of argument... (Also divets. )
Collar shape and construction... (Shirt's an advertisement for tie space and spread collars.)
Tie shape, construction, color and knot... (Tie's awful and the knot's too big. Who ties anything other than a FIH these days?)
Cuff height... (Cuffs are both too large and too small)
Shoe construction... (Shoes have a rubber sole.)

Not even the Incredible Hulk can affect so many aspects of his dress by moving

Return of Gekko this month, or next?

Distinguished Member

Distinguished Member

Distinguished Member

Distinguished Member

Senior Member

Distinguished Member

Distinguished Member

Distinguished Member

Distinguished Member

Distinguished Member

Distinguished Member

Distinguished Member

Distinguished Member

Distinguished Member

Distinguished Member

Classic Menswear Featured products

Similar threads

Featured Sponsor

Definitely full canvas only

Half canvas is fine

Really don't care

Depends on fabric

Depends on price

Forum Sponsors

Forum statistics

FOLLOW STYLEFORUM ON: