Trouser fit critique - how slim is slim, and are these slim enough?

[UserNameToronto]

I pinned the hems on a new set of trousers, purchased from a mainstream retailer.

The fit is "fitted", but I am not so sure. I'm a young-ish professional, and most of my other trou measure about 8.25 at the ankle. These trousers also measure 8.25, but they seem to be more full cut somehow? Or maybe they're fine?

Appreciate your time & advice.

Attachment 46104

Attachment 46103

 

[yirayira]

retake the photos with more light shining on you.

 

[landshark]

From what I can see they are narrow enough for me. If you are uncomfortable, however, go to a tailor and have them tapered.

 

[aeglus]

Speaking as a guy that likes slim and fitted stuff, they look fine.

 

[Yika]

your pockets seem to be flaring out.

 

[nmprisons]

Originally Posted by Yika

your pockets seem to be flaring out.

Your pockets are flaring out and you can see your junk. If you are ok with that, then go for it.

 

[UserNameToronto]

Originally Posted by nmprisons

Your pockets are flaring out and you can see your junk. If you are ok with that, then go for it.

So, they're too tight? Does not compute

 

[awxg]

That doesn't necessarily mean it's tight. Probably has more to do with the cut of the trou or your posture.

 

[Wideknot]

I would call the legs a good fit. Not "skinny," not "wide," not even "slim" just simply good. The length may be good, it is hard to tell the way it is bunching on your shoe, but they look short even for no-break. The fit at the hips, however, (and I would guess the seat as well) is not doing you any favors. It is too restrictive. This is causing the pockets to flare and preventing the pants from falling freely from the waist band across the front. Could it be that they are riding up in back as well? As these are dress pants, not jeans, and the fabric needs to fall, not conform, I wouldn't recommend cutting them too closely to the body.

 

[GoldenTribe]

They look good from the front but if that's not a boner picture you took for us, something's wonky with the profile...

 

[sho'nuff]

i like the look. however i would take in the leg/thigh just a tad more to get it streamlined unless you are going for the officewear look. which then, it is fine.

 

[TheFoo]

If anything, they are too tight. But the real problem is that they simply don't fit well.

 

[trader]

^ you can't foof the size of one's cawk

 

[UserNameToronto]

Originally Posted by sho'nuff

i like the look. however i would take in the leg/thigh just a tad more to get it streamlined unless you are going for the officewear look. which then, it is fine.
Thanks. Officewear is indeed the look I am going for.

Originally Posted by mafoofan

If anything, they are too tight. But the real problem is that they simply don't fit well.

Thanks for the photochop. I wonder why the fit seems so far off - is it me or the pants? Waist looks OK, legs look OK, but crotch is too roomy? Not roomy enough? Should I just return them?

Originally Posted by trader

^ you can't foof the size of one's cawk
Or can you? This is is a burden I must carry.

 

[bowtielover]

From what I can tell you might want to have the pants pegged in a bit on the sides. It dose look a littel loose in the leg facing in.