STYLE_ADDICT
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2008
- Messages
- 77
- Reaction score
- 0
This forum is truly addictive and dangerous!! The more I read the more obsessed I become with feeling the need to refine my wardrobe, and the best way to do that I guess is to start from the bottom and work my way up.
I have roughly 20 pairs of dress shoes/boots in my current collection consisting of Mezlan (1), Cole Haan (4), Aldo (12), Johnston & Murphy (1), and probably a couple others I can't think of. After reading this forum for the past couple of months I have come to the conclusion that I have roughly 20 pairs of junk that I have wasted my money on. I don't have any of the ugly square toe atrocities as I try to stick to more classic designs, but I do have a few that are on the more narrow end. I try to invest in shoes that can do double duty as in work and after hours so I definitely take that into consideration when purchasing.
I usually spend about $90-$150 on a pair of shoes so that is where my budget is. I am assuming Allen Edmonds (e-bay) will be the entry level shoe that will fit my budget, but if there are others please let me know. Here come the questions:
1) Do you feel that the style of trouser, flat front or pleated, influences the style of shoe that should be worn? Is it not so much whether the pant is flat front or pleated rather than the weight of the fabric that influences what shoe should be worn? I know that sounds weird but let me explain what is maybe only my odd point of view. I feel that a cap toe design made on a more narrow last looks good with both pleated and flat front trousers regardless of fabric weight. On the other hand, I feel that a split toe oxford made on a wider last needs a more substantial trouser to look right. This could obviously be just my silly point of view. I have 3 season wool trousers in pleated and flat front as well as winter weight wool trousers in pleated and flat front. I want my shoes to be as universal as possible.
2) I believe shoes are made to be worn, and not stored in a box so I wear all of my shoes.....a lot. Keeping with the fact that I like to be able to wear my shoes for both work and after hours (ie., out to dinner, social events, etc..) what styles will give me the most wearability? I would like to be able to wear my shoes with high quality denim as well as trousers is what I am saying I guess.
3) I would like to reform my collection and weed out some of the junk so I would like to purchase about 4-6 new pairs in 2008 to start a solid foundation. I would like to do 2 shoes in a variation of brown, 2 black, and 1-2 pairs of must have boots (dress of course). I want to work on the brown first and have been looking at the Evanston in cognac, the Soho in saddle brown, the Belmont in brown, and the Manhattan in brown (not sold on the brogueing). Thoughts? Additions?
I want to thank you in advance for your guidance. I hold the knowledge of the forum members in high regard and wish to learn much from many of you.
I have roughly 20 pairs of dress shoes/boots in my current collection consisting of Mezlan (1), Cole Haan (4), Aldo (12), Johnston & Murphy (1), and probably a couple others I can't think of. After reading this forum for the past couple of months I have come to the conclusion that I have roughly 20 pairs of junk that I have wasted my money on. I don't have any of the ugly square toe atrocities as I try to stick to more classic designs, but I do have a few that are on the more narrow end. I try to invest in shoes that can do double duty as in work and after hours so I definitely take that into consideration when purchasing.
I usually spend about $90-$150 on a pair of shoes so that is where my budget is. I am assuming Allen Edmonds (e-bay) will be the entry level shoe that will fit my budget, but if there are others please let me know. Here come the questions:
1) Do you feel that the style of trouser, flat front or pleated, influences the style of shoe that should be worn? Is it not so much whether the pant is flat front or pleated rather than the weight of the fabric that influences what shoe should be worn? I know that sounds weird but let me explain what is maybe only my odd point of view. I feel that a cap toe design made on a more narrow last looks good with both pleated and flat front trousers regardless of fabric weight. On the other hand, I feel that a split toe oxford made on a wider last needs a more substantial trouser to look right. This could obviously be just my silly point of view. I have 3 season wool trousers in pleated and flat front as well as winter weight wool trousers in pleated and flat front. I want my shoes to be as universal as possible.
2) I believe shoes are made to be worn, and not stored in a box so I wear all of my shoes.....a lot. Keeping with the fact that I like to be able to wear my shoes for both work and after hours (ie., out to dinner, social events, etc..) what styles will give me the most wearability? I would like to be able to wear my shoes with high quality denim as well as trousers is what I am saying I guess.
3) I would like to reform my collection and weed out some of the junk so I would like to purchase about 4-6 new pairs in 2008 to start a solid foundation. I would like to do 2 shoes in a variation of brown, 2 black, and 1-2 pairs of must have boots (dress of course). I want to work on the brown first and have been looking at the Evanston in cognac, the Soho in saddle brown, the Belmont in brown, and the Manhattan in brown (not sold on the brogueing). Thoughts? Additions?
I want to thank you in advance for your guidance. I hold the knowledge of the forum members in high regard and wish to learn much from many of you.