• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Cordovan vs. Calf comfort level

Slewfoot

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2008
Messages
4,520
Reaction score
615
I would say that cordovan quickly becomes very soft and supple. I've only broken in Vass cordovan shoes so I'm not sure if other makers react differently as shell is known to be so fickle. It's a dense and tough leather, but not especially thick. Cordovan also seems to mold to one's foot a bit better than calf. For those reasons I'd probably give the edge to cordovan in the same maker and last. There's not a world of difference, but just a subtle touch.
 
Last edited:

Newcomer

Stylish Dinosaur
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2009
Messages
10,408
Reaction score
27,642

I would say that cordovan quickly becomes very soft and supple. I've only broken in Vass cordovan shoes so I'm not sure if other makers react differently as shell is known to be so fickle. It's a dense and tough leather, but not especially thick. Cordovan also seems to mold to one's foot a bit better than calf. For those reasons I'd probably give the edge to cordovan in the same maker and last. There's not a world of difference, but just a subtle touch.


+1, but I do find that cordovan is a bit tougher to break in. It is also a bit less pliable, if that makes sense, but that fades as it conforms to your foot.
 

JamesX

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2010
Messages
1,031
Reaction score
18
Cordovan after a while feels more comfortable than Calf. It is firmer and "tighter" but it is noticeably heavier.
 

Achillus

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2011
Messages
1,231
Reaction score
27
Cordovan.
 

TheWGP

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2010
Messages
1,188
Reaction score
41
Both can be comfortable, there is definitely a weight difference though. Sometimes you can notice the thickness of the leather more with cordovan as well - wear something like a PTB or a chukka or other plain-toed model all day on a hot day sometime with lots of walking, and then feel the leather near the toe. If they're "broken in" you'll probably be a bit surprised how much give and flexibility the shell can have.

I've concluded it's all a matter of personal preference - most of my shoes (73.33%) are shell, and I like that. I'm by no means a true shoe-fanatic, but of my but I'd love to try some of the more beautiful calf models I've seen, particularly from top-end makers. I think once you have a good quality shoe, leather choice is just another variable to consider in your choice, not really a fundamental difference in terms of comfort or wearability.
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 102 36.6%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 100 35.8%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 36 12.9%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 46 16.5%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 41 14.7%

Forum statistics

Threads
508,071
Messages
10,599,304
Members
224,537
Latest member
RravisEngen
Top