kayjaybee
Senior Member
- Joined
- May 5, 2012
- Messages
- 239
- Reaction score
- 87
imo the laga12 is even bigger than the 16
I've never had it (it's on my must-try list) but I've read the same thing...can't go wrong with either, IMO.
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
imo the laga12 is even bigger than the 16
Good to know. Thinking I may still pick it up as, in my very limited experience to this point, I've preferred things like Lagavulin and Talisker to more subtle scotches.
Actually, this preference reminds me of how I got into wine. I used to exclusively drink big reds (ex. Shiraz or Cabernet Sauvignon, often from California or Australia) and the more red-like whites (ex. oakier Chardonnays). Over the past few years, I've started to appreciate the earthiness and mineral notes that tend to be more easily detected in less full-bodied wines, and often find the very big wines a bit one-dimensional.
I'm wondering if the same drift in preference is something I can expect in scotch. Have anyone of you veteran scotch drinkers gone through a pronounced change in preference over the years, such as moving from Islays to Speysides?
I've been curious to get amas and bacons opinion on OP for awhile but never remember, so what's the word?
Meant specifically the 21, where would that rank on the hierarchy of affordable scotches?
which ardberg? budget is somewhat flexible. on one hand i feel like gifting a 150, 200 ish bottle, but i woudl feel bad and i think they would feel bad. i think 60 or 70 is reasonable