ntempleman
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2014
- Messages
- 1,363
- Reaction score
- 2,740
It looks as though the sock leather has been stretched to maximise yield, and once it's absorbed your perspiration it has shrunk back to its natural size
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Well it looks rustic alright
In our case, those two are not mutually exclusive!Depends which version of English you adhere to; the one that you guys modified, or the one that we routinely butcher.
Depends which version of English you adhere to......
Or, these days far more likely, which version of English your spell-checker adheres to.
Whenever I type "labor", "humor", "honor", the thing screams in pain until I change it to "labour", "humour", "honour".
I have a hard time believing those are handmade, as well. But then anything is possible, I suppose, even if it doesn't make a lot of sense.
That said, I'm not sure what I'm seeing there. I cannot think of a single process that is consistent with handmade shoes that would result in this kind of slippage(?) / issue / problem.
My best guess(and it could be wildly wrong) is that the shoe is a cement construction--the upper glued to the underside of the insole--and the upper has broken the cement and pulled away from the insole. The cream colour is the lining leather that has lost the finish (dissolved by the cement) and the extent to which it shows is an indication of how much it has slipped.
This could have happened after the fact--such as when the shoe was stretched (if it was) or in the factory or by the maker if the shoe was mis-lasted. It's hard to tell.
Overall ...and another guess...I'd have to say it's not a good sign.
Interesting!
Here is a better zoomed in photo
I think you can see some type of warp/weft?
I do believe however that these were "object dyed"
That is, dyed after the entire shoe was constructed (literally dipped in a bucket of dye laces and all)
So it is conceivable that this is some non leather material that does not accept the dye?
Better photo but almost certainly not canvas. See the way in which the black of the lining "melds" into the "cream"? At highest magnification you can almost see the hair follicle pits in the both the black and the cream. And those black striations are typical of finish that has not been entirely removed. Although I suppose they could also be "seepage" but more likely from the flesh side.
Perhaps it was dyed after the fact. But more likely with a brush. If it had been dip dyed, one would expect that the edge of the sockliner /insole would also be black...which doesn't appear to be the case at highest resolution. Also the threads would be black. And the "edge" / margin between the cream and the black would be less distinct (although there doesn't seem to be any real "disconnect" or edge at all between the black and the cream--suggesting it is all one piece). Beyond that, if the cream were canvas the black dye would have wicked extensively and that edge would have been even less sharp--the canvas would have accepted the dye much,much more readily than the leather. And if it were dip-dyed or even dyed after the fact it certainly is an indication that something has moved / shrunk / been stretched beyond the original position.
Regardless (and short of actually inspecting the shoe in person most of this is admittedly at least in the realm of conjecture) it's not a good sign.If nothing else it suggests that things are not as they have been represented. But if the shoes fit you...and I suspect there's not a lot of options with regard to returning them...then just forget about it. It is what it is. The shoes probably...probably, no guarantees...won't explode underfoot.
edited for punctuation and clarity
Well it looks rustic alright
I like your sense of humor! (or is it humour?)
Depends which version of English you adhere to; the one that you guys modified, or the one that we routinely butcher.
In our case, those two are not mutually exclusive!
Quite right too, but try getting it to accept 'advice' without it changing to advise