Edward Appleby
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2005
- Messages
- 3,162
- Reaction score
- 5
--- I agree to a point, but I find art hip but I wouldn't wear it persay, this is an artistic suit and obviousy not meant to confine itself to a rule. I wouldn't go so far as to say any clothing not made for formal rules is gaudy/ignorant/hollywood or whatever else;. It strictly something to look at like a painting on a wall. As a side note formality, I have a Kiton one button peak lapel tuxedo as I dress according to the event/audience and hopefully good taste.Originally Posted by Soph
Not to be quarrelsome (I just want something to help me put off my homework), but I would have to disagree. Clothing, by its nature, cannot exist separate from the act of wearing it. Whether or not it is actually worn is one thing (for example, a dress in a museum can be appreciated as clothing), but it must always be judged in the context of being worn. Otherwise, it's not much more than a glorified collage of some mixed media bullshit, is it?
Re your point about clothing not made according to the rules, I would argue that if a garment has a pretention, so to speak, of being formal, but grossly violates the rules defining said formality it is either a. gauche or b. ironic and probably po-mo to the point of irritation.