Quote:
Originally Posted by
lance konami 
No evidence. Period. I was as shocked as anyone when I found that out. Check out Brad Pilons book "How much protein?" He goes over tons of regularly cited research used by various supplement companies and basically shows that the only supplement that is actually scientifically proven to increase muscle mass is creatine and anabolic steroids. We need protein of course, but not nearly as much as you think.
Hmm...can you link me to any of these studies? Pretty interesting since everywhere I've read seems to confirm that protein is integral to muscle synthesis.
Here are some studies I found real quick:
Quote:
Orally Administered Leucine Stimulates Protein Synthesis in Skeletal Muscle of Postabsorptive Rats in Association with Increased eIF4F Formation
We investigated the protein synthetic response of skeletal muscle to an orally administered dose of leucine given alone or in combination with carbohydrate. Male rats were freely fed (F) or food deprived for 18 h; food-deprived rats were then administered saline (S), carbohydrate (CHO), leucine (L) or a combination of carbohydrate plus leucine (CL). CHO and CL meals were isocaloric and provided 15% of daily energy requirements. L and CL meals each delivered 270 mg leucine. Muscle protein synthesis in S was 65% of F (P < 0.01) 1 h after meal administration. Concomitant with lower rates of protein synthesis, phosphorylation of the translational repressor, eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF)4E-binding protein 1 (4E-BP1), was less in S, leading to greater association of 4E-BP1·eIF4E, and reduced formation of the active eIF4G·eIF4E complex compared with F (P < 0.01). Oral administration of leucine (L or CL), but not CHO, restored protein synthesis equal to that in F and resulted in 4E-BP1 phosphorylation that was threefold greater than that of S (P < 0.01). Consequently, formation of 4E-BP1·eIF4E was inhibited and eIF4G·eIF4E was not different from F. The amount of eIF4E in the phosphorylated form was greater in S and CHO (P < 0.01) than in all other groups. In contrast, no differences in the phosphorylation state of eIF2{alpha} or the activity of eIF2B were noted among treatment groups. Serum insulin was elevated 2.6- and 3.7-fold in CHO and CL, respectively, but was not different in L, compared with S (P < 0.05).
These results suggest that leucine stimulates protein synthesis in skeletal muscle by enhancing eIF4F formation independently of increases in serum insulin.