STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
I understand the distinction between printed and woven patterns, but is there a name for that subset of woven-pattern ties where the foreground elements are raised above the background, in relief?
Cheers,
Ac
I think this is what I always thought of. Raised florets or patterns. And they often seem a bit cheap (just because jacquard is so much more common than print). I've seen plenty that don't look cheap though
Though that's another interesting question: is it cheaper to weave a pattern than to print it?
Quote:
Indeed. And similarly for hand-weaving. That is what I don't know—viz. how much mechanization has changed the cost of weaving and how much it has changed the cost of printing.
Cheers,
Ac
Looks "jacquard" to me. And we should find a new term...I can feel David wince every time we say it.
@TweedyProf, thoughts?
And yet people--not just SF--appear to use jacquard to refer to certain types of woven ties. For whatever reason. It's just on SF there seems to be a general distaste for them. Again, for whatever reason.
Though I'd hazard that the last would fall into the vernacular use.This is labelled by Drakes as jacquard. It would probably also be classified as such by the maybe vernacular use of the term.
These are not classified as such. And I can't tell if they were made on a jacquard loom.
So I don't know:
- if the vernacular use actually exists
- if the vernacular use has any sort of consistent application
- if Drakes is labeling all jacquard (non-vernacular) ties as jacquard or only some of them
- if Drakes is then labeling by the vernacular (assuming it exists and it is consistent)
A jacquard loom looks like a pretty complex and expensive piece of machinery. An ink jet printer must be a lot cheaper.
Old school block printing is probably expensive because of high manual labour costs.
Then is it just me that sees jacquard A LOT more often than prints in stores?