rohde88
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2008
- Messages
- 507
- Reaction score
- 23
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
You don't need a winder just because you have a mechanical watch.
what IWC will be under $2k?
I think many miss the irony in having Bond where a dive watch with a tux. I believe they made such a big deal about it because it is so out of place, giving a slight hint to his job.
It's missed by most now, but people probably understood the irony in the 60's.
I think many miss the irony in having Bond where a dive watch with a tux. I believe they made such a big deal about it because it is so out of place, giving a slight hint to his job.
It's missed by most now, but people probably understood the irony in the 60's.
Absolutely NOT true. In fact a number of companies are making noise about sizing down again. And many of the top brands continued to offer watches in the 35mm +/- range.I see your point, but watches have evolved since the 60's - by that I mean they're all big.
A number of vintage models in 18K. There are steel versions below $1K. I just bought one: round, 18KYG, baton hands, baton markers, elegantly simple. Some might call it understated. It's about 35mm. No, it's not 40mm ... like some of the current models ... but that is overly large for the average wrist. Many men out there seen to have little grasp of proper proportion.what IWC will be under $2k?
Money isn't the equal of taste.If I were wearing a Patek Phillipe Nautilus with a tux and someone chastised me for wearing a diving watch I would beat them over the head with a stack of money.
Absolutely NOT true. In fact a number of companies are making noise about sizing down again. And many of the top brands continued to offer watches in the 35mm +/- range.
A few months back, a local dealer with whom I do a fair amount of business started pushing a larger JLC at me. I told him I was not interested. He continued to push and asked me to wear his for a week. He was sure it would change my mind ... and frankly would not take no for an answer. I always recall the night my spouse saw it and exclaimed "Holy Geezus, what is that? Looks like a satellite dish!" At the end of the week, I was stilled turned off ... and my wrist size is above average.
A number of vintage models in 18K. There are steel versions below $1K. I just bought one: round, 18KYG, baton hands, baton markers, elegantly simple. Some might call it understated. It's about 35mm. No, it's not 40mm ... like some of the current models ... but that is overly large for the average wrist. Many men out there seen to have little grasp of proper proportion.
May or may not be your thing ... but they can be had.
Money isn't the equal of taste.