Ankor
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2013
- Messages
- 50
- Reaction score
- 4
I prefer shoes that have a slightly wider vamp that taper towards the toe-box to create a chisel/point as opposed to one that is uniformly slim.
I agree.
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
I prefer shoes that have a slightly wider vamp that taper towards the toe-box to create a chisel/point as opposed to one that is uniformly slim.
That's true, though I'm not sure who, on the thread, is saying that sleek and narrow lasts always look better.
I prefer shoes that have a slightly wider vamp that taper towards the toe-box to create a chisel/point as opposed to one that is uniformly slim. Shoes that are out of proportion are, naturally, ugly. Like suits. Like tie against lapels etc.
Also did anyone have a strong chemical smell on their shoes? Mine reek?
And make it a double monk to go full iGent...
Hatch grain is a casual printed/pressed leather more suitable for country shoes, not something to be worn proud and showcased like croc or lizard suede.
p.s., symmetrical lasts shapes are inorganic and inelegant.
p.s.s., Meermin does not have a chisel toe last. Square, yes. But not chiseled.
Sleek and narrow lasts doesn't always look better. Actually it looks dreadfully ugly if you do not possess legs of giraffe with a starving teenage boy body.
It's all about proportions.
Just to be clear, in your opinion the following shoes look like ****?
No, but the choices is certainly very interesting and conflicted.
Whole cut construction is the perfect canvass to showcase exotic leathers such as crocs, stingrays, etc, or to showcase patine work by patine artists at Berluti or elsewhere, or to showcase a mirror like elegant mirror shine.
But here, we have a pair of whole cuts with hatch grain, a printed calf leather. Not the best quality leather, nor the most expensive ones, nor is it suitable for patine work or mirror shine. It is, to me, akin to using Cordovan leather to construct a pair of embroiled house slipper. Not the best choice IMHO.
You are talking from a top down perspective and your description is fairly generic to square, narrow rounded, chisel or even rounded lasts.
But a chisel last (as oppose to square) has a knock down effect towards the tip of the toe box, most visibly from the side profile.
non bespoken wholecuts are generally... ugly and shapeless.. also the fact that most of the pictures are of new unworn pairs of shoes, divorced from the whole harmony of outfit, doesn't help. chisel or square toe lasts work best when worn together with sleek, sculpted suit, with well defined shoulder and waist. and probably hats as well.
Just to be clear, in your opinion the following shoes look like ****?
Of course there'll always be a wider vamp that tapers. It's always a matter of degree isn't it? 1 mm wider or 5 mm or 10 mm. I meant slightly wider than normal.
Here's a picture to illustrate what I mean:
On the New Rey, you can see that it widens and tapers. But the widening and tapering are all very moderate compared with C & J 348 last, you'll see that the 348 has a wider vamp. The wider vamp also allows for a stronger chisel without hurting one's foot, and like I said, looks more proportionate as well.
So I'm confused where we stand on the wholecut hatchgrain.
It's going to look like the picture posted in this thread?
If so, I'm in.
I meant the toe box chisel from the side profile, i.e., the tapering is not only top down but from the side profile view as well.
348 is not that chiseled, just a narrow square.