STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
but so far
none of my shoes
have 'deformed' for lack
of this side lining
(oldest one about 10 yrs)
The object of using the side lining is to continue the support around the feather line of the shoe between the ends of the heel-stiffener and the toe-box.
The waist, under the joints, and the forepart have to stand the whole strain of the bending and flexing of the foot. These parts of the shoe cannot be made rigid as in the heel portion and the toe, because it would interfere with the flexibility of the shoe in walking, but some additional support around the feather line of the shoe is required to stand the strain and stress placed upon it at these points. Hence the necessity of a light but good side lining.
W Wardley in F Y Golding (editor) “Boots and Shoes” Volume IV (London 1935)
is that your sharkskin chukka rolf?
bestetti doesn't use it
but he does refer to
'leather reinforcement'
for some more delicate leathers.
Nope, no fish. Those boots are shrunken Kudu.
Perhaps T4 could provide more pictures of their creation...
MtB
nice!
and thanks for the info!
T4:
In looking at the pics, I noticed the absence of a side lining on Bestetti's shoes. Does he in fact not use a side lining?
Nice shoes, by the way!
Maybe the Italians do not use them either.
to make a blind supposition
of 'not lasting well'
it at best hasty
to make a blind supposition
of 'not lasting well'
it at best hasty
yes it silly.
me busy and me make mistake