- Joined
- Mar 16, 2006
- Messages
- 8,771
- Reaction score
- 5,800
Weren't you the one sporting those cut-off gloves without the fingers?
Those are driving gloves
When you lose an argument with your wife, you win.
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Weren't you the one sporting those cut-off gloves without the fingers?
Weren't you the one sporting those cut-off gloves without the fingers?
Those are driving gloves
When you lose an argument with your wife, you win.
Sure--but they aren't "fun."
So why wear them? Surely they were not functional, either to keep fingers warm or for driving a car.
So why wear a pocket square, or a tie, or a anything other than a single-piece jumpsuit?
a single-piece jumpsuit
i also think that these things are really ugly, but aren't you being a huge hypocrite? isn't sprezzatura the definition of injecting fun into your dress? also, some people don't view men's clothes in such rigid puritanical guidelines. there's following the rules, but there's also dressing without any soul.
Since when am I pro-sprezzatura, and since when does sprezzatura mean "injecting fun into your dress"? In what sense is my choice of dress "puritanical"? And how is that equivalent to "dressing without any soul"?
But when something is intended to look "fun," it always looks bad.