montecristo#4
Stylish Dinosaur
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2004
- Messages
- 12,214
- Reaction score
- 21
In fairness its a very very old city.
Good point. Chicago, LA, Philadelphia, and Dallas were mere cowpaths when Boston won the very first World Series in 1903.
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
In fairness its a very very old city.
After this season, Brady will have 2 MVPs to Manning's three. Not a huge difference.
What does this even mean?
You know for a FACT? Really? How do you know that for a fact? You must be the supreme judge of NFL talent. Funny how Manning has only one 1 SB and Brady has 3. Yet Manning is better in the postseason? Also Manning has almost always had better and more consistent talent around him as well as much more stable Coordinators. You don't think that has been an advantage.
Which are you debating. Stats are FACT. And by the stats, as far as the QB position goes, there is nothing Brady does that Manning hasn't. How can you even bring up coaching staff when BB is in the all-time greatest convo. I think based on KC's success with Romeo and Weiss, NE coordinators weren't too shabby when they are just a cog in the system. Talent? You bring up SB's but fall to mention that the NE defense was always superior. I think as evidenced by letting Moss go, the system is what fuels the machine more so than pure talent. I don't remember Harrison's talent really paying off when those NE DB's popped him in the mouth a few times. And honestly, that's a system too. When Branch left for $ he was exposed as pedestrian. Who on the Colts O has gone on to continued success after leaving?
Impossible to argue with this level of stupid.
Impossible to argue with this level of stupid.
Which are you debating. Stats are FACT. And by the stats, as far as the QB position goes, there is nothing Brady does that Manning hasn't. How can you even bring up coaching staff when BB is in the all-time greatest convo. I think based on KC's success with Romeo and Weiss, NE coordinators weren't too shabby when they are just a cog in the system. Talent? You bring up SB's but fall to mention that the NE defense was always superior. I think as evidenced by letting Moss go, the system is what fuels the machine more so than pure talent. I don't remember Harrison's talent really paying off when those NE DB's popped him in the mouth a few times. And honestly, that's a system too. When Branch left for $ he was exposed as pedestrian. Who on the Colts O has gone on to continued success after leaving?
i concur, only ali was more overrated as a superstar
Good point. Chicago, LA, Philadelphia, and Dallas were mere cowpaths when Boston won the very first World Series in 1903.
Ginger or Mary Ann?
You are correct. Brady 3 Manning 1 and that's the bottom line. Brady is the big game quarterback and anyone that wants to be a winner or is a winner would want him and recognize that.
Just out of curiosity, who in your opinion was the better baseball player, Ted Williams or Joe DiMaggio?
Just out of curiosity, who in your opinion was the better baseball player, Ted Williams or Joe DiMaggio?
I would say DiMaggio but that isn't an opinion based on watching them.