Contingency Plan
Senior Member
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2006
- Messages
- 927
- Reaction score
- 65
It is necessary for god to exist yo
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Honest question, not trying to troll... but does that make any sense at all? Maybe this is exposing me as the empiricist that I may very well be, but isn't that the same as going "I believe in unicorns. I can't explain it and if you were to argue with me rationally I may well lose. It doesn't matter; I believe nonetheless."?
Please explain why a rational, or warranted belief, has to be supported by evidence? We all have many beliefs for which there is no evidence. Rob
Hi there, I'm catholic too and went to church today for the first time in a few months. I was very busy for a majority of those past weeks with school and work on Sundays, but I can't say that was an excuse to not give an hour of my time each week. During and after mass, I lost that guilty feeling of having missed church, and having listened to an exceptional homily from our campus minister, I felt rejuvenated and accepting of God's plan for me. Life doesn't always make sense for a 20-year-old trying to find a way through relationships and immaturity, but having a community of fellow religious students to share the Word with and to know that they are in the same transitions of life is comforting. To answer your question, yes, I have faith in a God. Regards, Mick
i am not claiming that their is not god. i just doubting that it is neither rational nor warranted. one could make an argument for the sensual experience as being basic possibly, but that is doubtable as well. frankly the the plantinga argument to me on this point is bs. it seems a simple of avoiding one in the first place. you coaim belief belief god is basic thus you need not give any proof..... what makes beliefs in gods rational or warranted?
Honest question, not trying to troll... but does that make any sense at all? Maybe this is exposing me as the empiricist that I may very well be, but isn't that the same as going "I believe in unicorns. I can't explain it and if you were to argue with me rationally I may well lose. It doesn't matter; I believe nonetheless."?
what evidence do you have for your belief that god doesn't exist?
And please add what evidence is there for the proposition that god does not exist.
If it is a requirement for all basic beliefs to have evidence, then there is no such thing as a basic belief, only beliefs that we hold on the evidence of other beliefs. Yes? That doesn't seem to make any sense at all.
It's not up to those that don't believe to produce evidence that something doesn't exist. It's up to those that believe to show evidence that what they believe in exists. If the evidence for belief is shown to be faulty or inconsistent or whatever, then there's no reason to believe. Atheism exists because there are those that believe in God. If there was no religion atheists wouldn't exist.
no a requirement for a basic belife if they exist...(i do not like the concept) is not evidence but instead a hard qualifier, what makes belief x rational and warranted. i am not saying you need evidnce but you need to qulaify why belife in gods is rational and warranted. something form the limited reading of palntinga i have seen is not properly investigated much liek the concept of natural evil.