Crafty Cumbrian
Master Builder
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2017
- Messages
- 6,164
- Reaction score
- 27,978
Yes right among em mate, never been a walker and my knees are knackered now. 🧛‍♂️Take it you're close to the lakes - this is criminal.
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Yes right among em mate, never been a walker and my knees are knackered now. 🧛‍♂️Take it you're close to the lakes - this is criminal.
Yes right among em mate, never been a walker and my knees are knackered now. 🧛‍♂️
This has been discussed previously, but here goes again. They look amazingly nice! But the problem is - GYW or any of its variations (storm welting etc) is not waterproof, even with (as Trickers suggest) adding a smear of dubbin to the welts. And how much do they weigh? My present Meindl boots weigh less than 2kg the pair. How can they compete with modern technical hiking boots with cemented waterproof soles and Goretex, or some other make, waterproof uppers that you can go through water, mud, etc, in, and your feet keep dry, and in addition cost less than half the price? Well, half a century or more ago, these kind of boots would have been the best choice, and your feet would have still got wet but they would have lasted a life time (a life time of wet feet).It's subjective of course, but I would choose a number of specialist hiking brands over the Tricker's. I do lots of very long hikes, ranging from 30-50km so value my walking boots being lightweight. I'd probably avoid GYW construction for this reason. I don't really care much for looks with hiking boots as for me they are technical, utilitarian footwear - tools not jewels!
They're not functional and too expensive. Take out the expensive comment if you wish if cost is not an issue. They are not functional because they will not be waterproof, despite Tricker's suggestion to add dubbin to the welts. And compared to modern technical hiking boots they will be too heavy. They will never be considered as a serious hiking boot. Fenners81's comment back a few pages was witty - and correct. These will be used to hike around a local park, wearing a latest Barbour jacket, then off to the pub. Or perhaps to pick the kids up (then off to the pub?).Would like to see what you consider better hiking boots for less money?
I don't mind how they they look although there are details I would change. The triple stitching is a nice touch but I wish Tricker's had made them a wholecut and offered an all black colourway.
My nomination for alternative leather hiking boots goes to Amundsen's Mountain Mucks; with or with gaiters!
View attachment 2180013 View attachment 2180015 View attachment 2180017
They're not functional and too expensive. Take out the expensive comment if you wish if cost is not an issue. They are not functional because they will not be waterproof, despite Tricker's suggestion to add dubbin to the welts. And compared to modern technical hiking boots they will be too heavy. They will never be considered as a serious hiking boot. Fenners81's comment back a few pages was witty - and correct. These will be used to hike around a local park, wearing a latest Barbour jacket, then off to the pub. Or perhaps to pick the kids up (then off to the pub?).
S**t they do look nice though..
But thanks very much for the Amundsen link.Very interesting!They're not functional and too expensive. Take out the expensive comment if you wish if cost is not an issue. They are not functional because they will not be waterproof, despite Tricker's suggestion to add dubbin to the welts. And compared to modern technical hiking boots they will be too heavy. They will never be considered as a serious hiking boot. Fenners81's comment back a few pages was witty - and correct. These will be used to hike around a local park, wearing a latest Barbour jacket, then off to the pub. Or perhaps to pick the kids up (then off to the pub?).
S**t they do look nice though..