audiophilia
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2008
- Messages
- 3,251
- Reaction score
- 78
They are very tonally accurate and the imaging is dead-on.
A first, then.
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
They are very tonally accurate and the imaging is dead-on.
A first, then.
My thoughts exactly. Any Dunlavy, even blindfolded with one arm tied behind its back, walks all over Wilson.
A first, then.
Several audio writers I know agree with me on this.
Audition them
Then, it must be true.
What store was this? Sound by Singer? Stereo Exchange?
I strongly disagree. I have never heard Dunlavy speakers sound good. Several audio writers I know agree with me on this.
Dunlavy designed speakers for mid-field mastering purposes, and have characteristics well suited for this. The narrow dispersion means great imaging at the monitoring position at the expense of a room filling sound. They are especially loved by jazz and classical mastering engineers, but not a great choice for audiophiles at home who typically have zero acoustic treatment.
Finally got my Denon DL 110 cartridge for my LP12. Sounds good, that's all I can say
See everyone are saying Sonus Faber is great. My concertinos home are ****, simply put. They sound like two plastic buckets, have no realism, no sound stage and very pathetic highs. everything sound boomy an bassy on SF just the way they look. It is leather and mahogany sound.