PoshGentleman
Member
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2014
- Messages
- 12
- Reaction score
- 0
Long time lurker here, first time poster.
When I was shopping around for new pairs of dress shoes, I got lots of good info on this site and read countless posts from many folks praising the beauty, construction, and overall quality of Crockett & Jones shoes. I have to admit, before coming onto this site, I didn't even know of the brand.
Anyway, two months ago, I ordered two pairs of C&J shoes - one Connaught and one Hallam - and I have to say, I have been hugely disappointed with both shoes, especially considering the amount of coin I had to spend to get those pairs.
I am sure the construction of these shoes are fine, but as a slim, tall, young guy (late 20's working professional, 6 foot tall, 175 pounds), these shoes don't suit me at all. BTW, I am rather keen on the styles of clothes, shoes, watches, etc and I absolutely hate anything 'boxy' - jackets, shirts, pants, shoes, etc.
I have several pairs of dress shoes from Bally, Ferragamos, and Prada (loafers, oxfords, and derby shoes), and every morning to work, I reach for one of these 'designer' shoes, rather than C&J shoes - largely for aesthetics. My Ferragamo, Prada, and Bally shoes are much sleeker and look much more refined.
My biggest problem with C&J Connaught is that it looks wayyy too boxy, especially around the waist. Toe area seems ok (not too good looking there either), but the mid-waist area of the shoe is too broad and boxy. Actually, this shoe looks boxier and even worse than the AE Park Avenues that I have. Which really is disappointing.
My problem with C&J Hallam is that the shoe last looks wayyy too long (much longer than any of my lace-up shoes or loafers from the Italian brands) and these shoes just look bad on me. (my feet look disproportional compared to the rest of body)
Since I live in NYC, I went to the John Lobb store in NYC and I was just STUNNED at how beautiful some of the shoes they had were. One shoe that really grabbed my attention was JLP Beckett Oxfords. I know that these shoes are way more expensive than the C&J shoes I bought, but I kept thinking, I should've just bought one pair of really solid-constructed shoes of style that I really love, rather than 2-3 good 'quality' shoes that I don't really want to wear at all, either to work or to dates with women, etc.
I am wondering - is there anyone here that shares my view? I've only read / heard good things about C&J, AE, etc around here, and I am sure the shoe quality itself is fine, but for young, fashion-forward guys like me, these brands' products just don't seem to have much appeal in terms of style / design. Maybe these shoes are meant for middle-aged 'corporate business people'.
Sorry for the long rant. I feel like I just wasted a crap load of money buying shoes that I never seem to wear.
When I was shopping around for new pairs of dress shoes, I got lots of good info on this site and read countless posts from many folks praising the beauty, construction, and overall quality of Crockett & Jones shoes. I have to admit, before coming onto this site, I didn't even know of the brand.
Anyway, two months ago, I ordered two pairs of C&J shoes - one Connaught and one Hallam - and I have to say, I have been hugely disappointed with both shoes, especially considering the amount of coin I had to spend to get those pairs.
I am sure the construction of these shoes are fine, but as a slim, tall, young guy (late 20's working professional, 6 foot tall, 175 pounds), these shoes don't suit me at all. BTW, I am rather keen on the styles of clothes, shoes, watches, etc and I absolutely hate anything 'boxy' - jackets, shirts, pants, shoes, etc.
I have several pairs of dress shoes from Bally, Ferragamos, and Prada (loafers, oxfords, and derby shoes), and every morning to work, I reach for one of these 'designer' shoes, rather than C&J shoes - largely for aesthetics. My Ferragamo, Prada, and Bally shoes are much sleeker and look much more refined.
My biggest problem with C&J Connaught is that it looks wayyy too boxy, especially around the waist. Toe area seems ok (not too good looking there either), but the mid-waist area of the shoe is too broad and boxy. Actually, this shoe looks boxier and even worse than the AE Park Avenues that I have. Which really is disappointing.
My problem with C&J Hallam is that the shoe last looks wayyy too long (much longer than any of my lace-up shoes or loafers from the Italian brands) and these shoes just look bad on me. (my feet look disproportional compared to the rest of body)
Since I live in NYC, I went to the John Lobb store in NYC and I was just STUNNED at how beautiful some of the shoes they had were. One shoe that really grabbed my attention was JLP Beckett Oxfords. I know that these shoes are way more expensive than the C&J shoes I bought, but I kept thinking, I should've just bought one pair of really solid-constructed shoes of style that I really love, rather than 2-3 good 'quality' shoes that I don't really want to wear at all, either to work or to dates with women, etc.
I am wondering - is there anyone here that shares my view? I've only read / heard good things about C&J, AE, etc around here, and I am sure the shoe quality itself is fine, but for young, fashion-forward guys like me, these brands' products just don't seem to have much appeal in terms of style / design. Maybe these shoes are meant for middle-aged 'corporate business people'.
Sorry for the long rant. I feel like I just wasted a crap load of money buying shoes that I never seem to wear.
Last edited: