William Massena
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2004
- Messages
- 73
- Reaction score
- 0
Having been a watch collector for 20 years I have noticed a funny trend over these years. The guys with the nicest watches are usually very ill fitted and show up with the ugliest shoes. Also the opposite hold true, I have noticed, especially here in NYC that well dress gents have very poor taste in watches. I have watches in my collection from the 20's including a Cartier tank allongee (without bling bling thank you), which I must admit does more than bring me joy since I could sell it today and fund a year of Ivy league college for my kid, especially given the fact that I paid $2,200 for it in 1991. I seriously doubt that any of my suits from the early 90's could be sold to fund more than 3 school books. Like clothes, watches are available at different price level, while I often read in this forum that some of you buy used clothes (something I could not imagine doing), I have read a few purchasing Kenneth Cole quartz from the price of a decent vintage manual wind. Watches do require knowledge and taste but not always money. There were much more bargains 20 years ago but the same can be say about clothes. Finally, you need to buy only one watch which could potentially reward you for the rest of your life, everyday and (pardon the pun) every minute, I can hardly think of any other material object that could do the same. Jon, it is funny that you have a quote from Charles V, king of Spain, & Holland and Emperor of the Holy Roman Empire (parts of Austria), he was most likely the largest watch collector of all time. He was known to own half the clocks produced and created during his time. WilliamLinux, I finally see something I agree with you on. It's amazing. I am with you, I could never spend an absurd amount on a watch, I think $400 is plenty. I might spend $1k on a watch ONCE. Styleman/whatever, you are SUCH a bad liar. Â