• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

#buttons vs. # of vents?

minimal

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2004
Messages
312
Reaction score
1
i'm getting a new suit (yay.), somewhere between off-the-rack and made-to-measure. i was either going to go 2-button 2 vent or 3-button no vent. i am tall (6'4") and lanky.

the saleperson suggested 3-button 2vent. but for some reason this combination doesn't seem to "go" in my brain. maybe i've never heard of it, or ever noticed it it, and so i'm not sure yet if i like the look or not.

so, in short, if anyone has something to add here, feel free to say something about the sartorial implications.

thanks in advance.
 

Mike C.

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2002
Messages
1,518
Reaction score
7
Usually with this combination, the lapel will be "rolled" to the second button, so the suit will appear to have two buttons instead of three. When wearing it, you only button the middle button. On higher end suits, this model is the norm rather than the exception.
 

retronotmetro

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 5, 2004
Messages
1,586
Reaction score
24
I have six suits from various makers with a 3-button, side vent combo. Some roll to the middle button and others roll to the top. Until recently it was not a widely available style of suit in the mass market (i.e. department store) suits, but very common in higher end and custom tailored suits. However, in the past couple of years it has started to trickle back into the mainstream--H Hilfiger and Banana Republic offer this style of coat.
 

GreyFlannelMan

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2004
Messages
823
Reaction score
1
Personally, I can't stand ventless suits.  I have one left in my wardrobe (three button) which I wear out of necessity, but have vowed not to get anymore.  I dislike how it bunches up in the back when one puts his hands in his pockets.  These days, I prefer side vents, though a center vent will suffice.
 

Horace

Distinguished Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2004
Messages
1,437
Reaction score
1
i'm getting a new suit (yay.), somewhere between off-the-rack and made-to-measure. i was either going to go 2-button 2 vent or 3-button no vent. i am tall (6'4") and lanky.

the saleperson suggested 3-button 2vent. but for some reason this combination doesn't seem to "go" in my brain. maybe i've never heard of it, or ever noticed it  it, and so i'm not sure yet if i like the look or not.

so, in short, if anyone has something to add here, feel free to say something about the sartorial implications.

thanks in advance.
Bravo, my good man. I think the 3 button with side vents will suit nicely. It's a good combination, and I have it on one of my bespoke suits.

In agreement with replies above. I wouldn't get a 3 button that rolled to the top button, however.
 

minimal

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2004
Messages
312
Reaction score
1
[didn't want to add another topic on this, since in some way the subject is really "me & new suit". hopefully some of the experts will see this topic rise to the top of the "current" list and reply]

OK, now what about coat LENGTH? sleeve length i understand, i'm asking about the coat's skirt.

I've heard many "formulas", from flusser to others. i've normally preferred my coats to the longish side, but now that i'm getting one that fits in a very different style (closer, cleaner), i'm reconsidering.

and, i also see that it is fashionable for them to be shorter in the recent few years. i don't want to be that fashionable, but don't want to ignore modernity either.

so, anything more scientific than "long enough to cover your backside"? again, i'm tall and skinny, so maybe there are some nonlinearities in this rule.

i look forward to your illumination.
 

minimal

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2004
Messages
312
Reaction score
1
well, *of course* my coat will cover my butt. all i can say is "yoiks." if otherwise.

but (ha.) it's hard to tell just how much when you're the one trying it on. so any rule that does not rely on seing how much of one's butt the jacket covers is helpful.

i think flusser says the coat should come to one's fingertips when the hands are naturally cupped and arms at one's sides. but does that mean "loosly open"? or with the fingers closed at the second joint?

again, thanks for the pointers, all helpful.
 
Joined
May 18, 2003
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
But it depends on what look you are going for.  If you sought out a lean silhouette because you want to look as tall and thin as possible, then you just might want a shorter coat.
I suppose in a work environment you'd want to blend in rather than stand out, but otherwise, I quite prefer lean silhouettes and would try to emphasise it rather than hide it. thin is elegant to me, and besides, not everyone has that body type, so you can work with it to make yourself look distinctive.
 

Concordia

Distinguished Member
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
7,721
Reaction score
1,672
Your mileage may vary, of course, but the end of my thumb is about where I'm comfortable having my jacket end. Some tailors will do another 1/2 inch or so with success, but that's a useful benchmark.
 

Trilby

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
180
Reaction score
3
Manton is exactly right about the leg to trunk ratio being the most important thing. I would add that, in getting this balance right, you need to think about whether your height is in your torso or your legs. Most of us tall people have our height in our legs -- if this is the case with you, then Manton's advice as to the jacket length is spot on. If you have normal length legs but a longer torso, then you might have to adjust the measurements slightly for everything to look in balance.

Trilby
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 92 37.4%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 90 36.6%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 27 11.0%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 41 16.7%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 38 15.4%

Forum statistics

Threads
506,971
Messages
10,593,136
Members
224,352
Latest member
Embroideredpatch
Top