- Joined
- Mar 30, 2009
- Messages
- 10,404
- Reaction score
- 27,613
Ding ding ding, Speedy Pro it is! I figured that the second guess would be right, you were definitely on the right track.
And I actually do enjoy the maxi-dial, but I also like the smaller dial. I think it just kind of depends on the model. For example, I love the new Explorer 2, although it did not sit well on my wrists unfortunately. I think that the lugs on the no-date sub just really ruin the "sensual" shape that I usually associate with the no-date sub. I wish that they did more than merely take off the oculus and the date of the sub-c, and call it a new model! I guess you can't have it all.
And that is a hell of a GMT model. Those old GMTs are just amazing. The faded bezels... mmm.
Now if I could find my camera charger
yeah I understand. That is why I flipped my Sub-c. But for some reason, the new GMT looks better with the maxi case. I can't explain it, it doesn't look too square like my former Sub-C. But I'm a sucker for the maxi dial, some people don't like it, but I love em.
okay, let me take another stab at it. Omega Speedmaster, or Planet Ocean?
Same here, the vintage I would really like to own some day would be a GILT PCG 1675.
Ding ding ding, Speedy Pro it is! I figured that the second guess would be right, you were definitely on the right track.
And I actually do enjoy the maxi-dial, but I also like the smaller dial. I think it just kind of depends on the model. For example, I love the new Explorer 2, although it did not sit well on my wrists unfortunately. I think that the lugs on the no-date sub just really ruin the "sensual" shape that I usually associate with the no-date sub. I wish that they did more than merely take off the oculus and the date of the sub-c, and call it a new model! I guess you can't have it all.
And that is a hell of a GMT model. Those old GMTs are just amazing. The faded bezels... mmm.
Now if I could find my camera charger