pinchi22
Senior Member
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2004
- Messages
- 444
- Reaction score
- 4
As a member of what I´ll call "Satorialists Anonymous", I admit to being sartorially ignorant, though I´d like to think my knowledge is constantly improving.
By coincidence, I measured my waist two days ago upon being informed that a pair of slacks had a 32 inch waist (despite the tagged size). I wear a 32 inch pant, irrespective of brand, and the fit is invariable good. Yet I also measured my waist to be significantly higher than the stated size - 34.5 inches. I measured at what I believe to be the slimmest point of my waist - aprox. 2 -3 inches below the navel.
I can only arrive at 2 explanations:
1) I am incompent in measuring.
2) Stated waist sizes deliberately don´t correspond to true measured waist (yes, maybe this is to convince obese people they´re really not so obese?).
Any insight, knowledgeable sartorialists?
By coincidence, I measured my waist two days ago upon being informed that a pair of slacks had a 32 inch waist (despite the tagged size). I wear a 32 inch pant, irrespective of brand, and the fit is invariable good. Yet I also measured my waist to be significantly higher than the stated size - 34.5 inches. I measured at what I believe to be the slimmest point of my waist - aprox. 2 -3 inches below the navel.
I can only arrive at 2 explanations:
1) I am incompent in measuring.
2) Stated waist sizes deliberately don´t correspond to true measured waist (yes, maybe this is to convince obese people they´re really not so obese?).
Any insight, knowledgeable sartorialists?