STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
I'd really love some more of these, but haven't seen them around in a couple years. Am I just looking in the wrong places? Am I the only one who even wants these?
Not sure I have ever seen many of these. Wool, yes. Cashmere, no. Wool is around, in most of the good NY stores. I have some. They are nice. I'm not sure I see any advantage to cashmere over wool for a PS, and wonder if the necessary thinness would make them too delicate.
It seems perverse to stuff wool into wool.
They're nice and soft--which doesn't change the appearance, but still. The delicacy is kind of appealing to me. Also, all my jackets are wool. It seems perverse to stuff wool into wool.
Doesn't Sam Hober have a few?
Not if you are sheep.
Not sure I have ever seen many of these. Wool, yes. Cashmere, no. Wool is around, in most of the good NY stores. I have some. They are nice. I'm not sure I see any advantage to cashmere over wool for a PS, and wonder if the necessary thinness would make them too delicate.
I only see wool on the site. Anyway, when I say I want a cashmere pocket square, I mean something that's almost fuzzy. The wool squares I've seen tend to have a smoother finish.
I don't get this since, as you say, they tend to look the same, sheen-wise.
Guys, it's a pocket square, no one should really care this much about one.
I only see wool on the site. Anyway, when I say I want a cashmere pocket square, I mean something that's almost fuzzy. The wool squares I've seen tend to have a smoother finish. Touche.