Transparent Moderation Log & Site Topics - Part I

Originally Posted by edmorel

Click to expand...

You are going to need to be more specific as "creepy one" can apply to many.
byebyewhitesamurai edit - damn - just a week. Im going to lobby to have his sentence increased.

Originally Posted by speedster.8

Click to expand...

Can I pose a question? How about posters that do so with the sole motive of generating traffic for their own site. Without any forum participation. If they have an agreement with SF for profit sharing it shut up. Otherwise il be more specific. You might even know what im talking about Speed
on the 'just to drive traffic' thing - I dont think anyone minded when the Sartorialist used us in that capacity a few years ago, since it was on topic, it did fuel discussion and so in the end, it was contributing to the board. Of course, when Scott acheived his current dizzying heights and left us behind, some resentment ensued. J's call, but my feeling is if you have something on your site that is on topic, you are open to have it criticised as well as complimented (if you are going to post links to your site, have people criticise it, and then drive us crazy with your Report Post button, then better to not go putting the links up), and you do participate in the conversations, then I have no problem with it.

I, for one, wish douchebo stayed a bit longer.

Originally Posted by whacked

Click to expand...

I, for one, wish douchebo stayed a bit longer.

Is he gone?

I accidentally spaminated him, told J, who reinstated him a few minutes later. That was an hour or so ago, but it should be OK now.

It appears that our MC has once again been banned.

What's the over/under of # of times Jon hit the report post button/email J to get the whole thing squirelled?

I'll start with 20.

It's a shame. Would've been interesting to see who won the Wis v. Dkzzz matchup.

Originally Posted by FLMountainMan

Click to expand...

It's a shame. Would've been interesting to see who won the Wis v. Dkzzz matchup.
Simply making it to the finals is enough. Just ask Tom Brady.

Originally Posted by whacked

Click to expand...

What's the over/under of # of times Jon hit the report post button/email J to get the whole thing squirelled?

I'll start with 20.

Awww

And it just started to get good!

Originally Posted by iammatt

Click to expand...

Simply making it to the finals is enough. Just ask Tom Brady.


However, Tom has Giselle to console him.

I should have squirreled it before I left this morning and you idiots wouldn't lay off Soph. I appreciate the hell out of that.

Originally Posted by j

Click to expand...

I should have squirreled it before I left this morning and you idiots wouldn't lay off Soph. I appreciate the hell out of that.

+1

Although I do think he took it a little personally as it was obvious people were just tryign to goad him.

I wanted to see what Douchebago used for my Into.

It was something like "blah blah Asparagus something and the True Label King"

Originally Posted by GQgeek

Click to expand...

Although I do think he took it a little personally as it was obvious people were just tryign to goad him.

It's too bad he left but he took it waaaaaay too personall and really shot himself in the foot. He was flying so low on the douchedar and didn't even get that many votes until he started getting upset and calling j a cokehead.

At any rate, if what was really a pretty tame thread ends up squirreled because of someone's inevitably douchey reaction, then there little hope we can ever have a proper douchebag contest here. While most of the nominees were a having a good time, it's sad that a few people seem too insecure to be able to laugh at themselves with a bunch of strangers on the Internet.

So who will take over from douchebo now?