• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Gaydar

mack11211

Distinguished Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2004
Messages
6,554
Reaction score
122
Originally Posted by edmorel
The sex act between two men is very different from the sex act between two women and I think it is fair to say that it requires a much bigger "commitment", one that does not lend itself to experimentation.

What in the world does this mean?

There are as many kinds of sex acts between men and men as there are between men and women, I reckon.

And regardless of the level of 'commitment' required, many millions of 'experiments' seem to take place.
 

mack11211

Distinguished Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2004
Messages
6,554
Reaction score
122

Kent Wang

Affiliate Vendor
Affiliate Vendor
Dubiously Honored
Joined
May 5, 2005
Messages
5,841
Reaction score
1,492
'Auspicious' is often used in Chinese -- in Chinese of course.
 

edmorel

Quality Seller!!
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Mar 10, 2006
Messages
25,980
Reaction score
5,170
Originally Posted by mack11211
What in the world does this mean?

There are as many kinds of sex acts between men and men as there are between men and women, I reckon.

And regardless of the level of 'commitment' required, many millions of 'experiments' seem to take place.


I won't get into this any deeper as simply reading words on an internet forum sometimes leads itself to misinterpretation and I don't want to come off as a homophobe. As I said, I joke about it all the time but I truly couldn't care less about what anyone does and who anyone does in their bedroom.
 

RJman

Posse Member
Dubiously Honored
Spamminator Moderator
Joined
Dec 10, 2004
Messages
19,162
Reaction score
2,092
Originally Posted by mack11211
What in the world does this mean?

There are as many kinds of sex acts between men and men as there are between men and women, I reckon.

And regardless of the level of 'commitment' required, many millions of 'experiments' seem to take place.

Maybe ed's implying something about the size of his... commitment.... in the hope GQGeek is reading?
 

mack11211

Distinguished Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2004
Messages
6,554
Reaction score
122
Originally Posted by edmorel
I won't get into this any deeper as simply reading words on an internet forum sometimes leads itself to misinterpretation and I don't want to come off as a homophobe. As I said, I joke about it all the time but I truly couldn't care less about what anyone does and who anyone does in their bedroom.
It was just an odd statement. I don't take you for a ****, neither 'phobe nor 'phile. What goes on between your Rubirosa and the swimsuit model, or not, is of no interest to me -- unless it involves steeply discounted Incotex, of course.
 

EL72

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 11, 2006
Messages
6,760
Reaction score
8
Originally Posted by JLibourel
I have long thought that if homosexuality is a genetically transmitted, immutable trait, as contemporary "enlightened" doctrine maintains, then ipso facto, this proves the Darwinian theory of Natural Selection wrong--far more than the cleversilly arguments of the Creationists!

This assumes that men would be excusively homosexual but the trait can be passed on while men produce offspring with women, which happens a lot in some societies of closet homosexuality.
 

edmorel

Quality Seller!!
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Mar 10, 2006
Messages
25,980
Reaction score
5,170
Originally Posted by RJman
Maybe ed's implying something about the size of his... commitment.... in the hope GQGeek is reading?

smile.gif


Originally Posted by mack11211
It was just an odd statement.

I don't take you for a ****, neither 'phobe nor 'phile.

What goes on between your Rubirosa and the swimsuit model, or not, is of no interest to me -- unless it involves steeply discounted Incotex, of course.


I'm an odd guy.

No steeply discounted clothing, you gays are given way too many perks by society as it is
smile.gif
 

globetrotter

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Sep 28, 2004
Messages
20,341
Reaction score
423
Originally Posted by JLibourel
I have long thought that if homosexuality is a genetically transmitted, immutable trait, as contemporary "enlightened" doctrine maintains, then ipso facto, this proves the Darwinian theory of Natural Selection wrong--far more than the cleversilly arguments of the Creationists!

not at all - evolution deals with genes, not individuals. if an argument can be made than having a gay family member promotes the genes (for instance, having a gay uncle means that every family has an additional adult male giving support) then it in no way contridicts darwinism.
 

imageWIS

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Apr 19, 2004
Messages
19,716
Reaction score
106
Originally Posted by edmorel
Well, not being gay I can't speak for anyone that is and my comment was a bit of a joke but, for me at least, if you are attracted sexually to men (and you are a man), you are gay, there is no bisexual. The sex act between two men is very different from the sex act between two women and I think it is fair to say that it requires a much bigger "commitment", one that does not lend itself to experimentation.


That's wrong.

Jon.
 

Connemara

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Mar 9, 2006
Messages
38,389
Reaction score
1,829
Originally Posted by edmorel
Just my opinion and you know what they say about opinions (they are like a-holes, everyone has one and it usually stinks)
smile.gif


Mine smells of freshly-picked lavender.
 

Willsw

Distinguished Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2007
Messages
1,190
Reaction score
3
If there is no bisexual, are those formerly known as bisexuals just gay men who like women? Is there a difference between those men and straight guys who like men?

And what about pure attraction, without sexual act? If one is more attracted to men than women (as a man) but has no desire to ******** with men, while maintaining that desire for women?

gaygayagyagayagayagayggagagyagayagyagayagaygayagay.
 

CBDB

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2006
Messages
485
Reaction score
0
"I tell you, when a homosexual is sucking *********, a lot of strange thoughts go through your head: How the hell did this happen? Where did this fairy ever get the idea that I was gay? And where did he get those fabulous boots?"

...and I thought he was just being friendly
laugh.gif
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 85 37.3%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 87 38.2%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 24 10.5%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 36 15.8%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 36 15.8%

Forum statistics

Threads
506,473
Messages
10,589,662
Members
224,250
Latest member
pdfilifestyle
Top