Jimmy Choo Men's Shoes

mrbateman · Jul 7, 2011

Thoughts?

http://www.jimmychoo.com/collections/mens/icat/mensus/

Mr.K · Jul 7, 2011

Most of those look like ****. I will stick to Alden for my shoes. No need to pay even more inflated prices for a designer shoe. I think the Jimmy Choo's should be left for the women.

mrbateman · Jul 7, 2011

Originally Posted by Mr.K

Most of those look like ****. I will stick to Alden for my shoes. No need to pay even more inflated prices for a designer shoe. I think the Jimmy Choo's should be left for the women.

+1

Achilles_ · Jul 7, 2011

Why do women pay so much for these shoes? Are they constructed better, more comfortable, etc....?

Infrasonic · Jul 7, 2011

Originally Posted by Achilles_

Why do women pay so much for these shoes? Are they constructed better, more comfortable, etc....?

Marketing, peer pressure.

radiation · Jul 7, 2011

Originally Posted by Achilles_

Why do women pay so much for these shoes? Are they constructed better, more comfortable, etc....?

Sex and the City.

As for men... Those shoes are entirely too expensive to be of such transient style. Not that I'm rushing out to pay $1100 for a pair of shoes when I can get good ones for $200-$300 (AE sales, etc), but I'm sure as hell not paying four figures for shoes that I wouldn't be caught dead in 18 months from now.

stinsonbass · Jul 7, 2011

Originally Posted by Infrasonic

Marketing, peer pressure.
+1 The shoes are hideous .. at least those for men are.. my ex had like 10 pairs of JC and they were quite awesome actually but in general it's advertising..

Except for the paisley loafers... I kind of like them

no I actually do .. it is a sin I know..

Gus · Jul 7, 2011

They look cheap to me....
But we know they aren't.

imageWIS · Jul 7, 2011

Forget about the dress shoes: no sneakers in the world are worth $700.

commodorewheeler · Jul 7, 2011

Originally Posted by Achilles_

Why do women pay so much for these shoes? Are they constructed better, more comfortable, etc....?

My wife has a few pairs of Jimmy Choos, and she says that they are the most comfortable heeled shoes that she's ever worn before. I compared them to some of her other shoes, and the construction does seem to be pretty good for a women's shoe.

Imhoff · Jul 7, 2011

"Rugged Suede"

See also "**** Stained"

mr monty · Jul 7, 2011

stinsonbass;4655202 Except for the paisley loafers... I kind of like them [IMG said:
https://www.styleforum.net/images/smilies/eek.gif[/IMG] no I actually do .. it is a sin I know..

You are not alone

Etro made some paisley laceups a few summesr ago, that were nice.

JayJay · Jul 7, 2011

Ugly. All of them.

lexmann · Jul 7, 2011

Originally Posted by Mr.K

Most of those look like ****. I will stick to Alden for my shoes. No need to pay even more inflated prices for a designer shoe. I think the Jimmy Choo's should be left for the women.

+1

JubeiSpiegel · Jul 7, 2011

Nonsense, JC doesn't even know their audience, they tell you nothing about the shoes. Can't even justify the price, I can get Ferragamos for $300 on sale better than these. I suppose it can be worse, Hermes may come out with a flip flop line at $1,000 a pair...

Jimmy Choo Men's Shoes

Well-Known Member

Distinguished Member

Well-Known Member

Distinguished Member

Distinguished Member

Active Member

Senior Member

Stylish Dinosaur

Stylish Dinosaur

Distinguished Member

Distinguished Member

Distinguished Member

Stylish Dinosaur

Senior Member

Distinguished Member

FEATURED PRODUCTS

Similar threads

Featured Sponsor

Definitely full canvas only

Half canvas is fine

Really don't care

Depends on fabric

Depends on price

Forum Sponsors

Forum statistics

FOLLOW STYLEFORUM ON: