STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
I find the front of the shirt doesn't lay well.
I get the opposite. If I'm floating my trousers a bit, the shirt tails never try to ride up out of my pants.
People wear them to keep their trousers up. Some people wear fancy colours and what not, using them as a fashion statement, but their primary function is to keep your trousers up.
I find them quite comfortable to wear and a little bit more dressed up when I put them on. I think they look pretty good as well.
<fail> Vests and double breasted have nothing to do with the appropriate wear of braces.
here in the USA, braces are used to straighten children's teeth. weird fact: In the UK, people use the word "braces" when they mean "suspenders"! (they don't ever use "braces" in our sense of the word, as any photo of a British person will confirm!!!)
You fail. His point seemed to be that a vest means a belt is inappropriate, therefore making braces a more likely option, though side-adjusters would be an option too.
Don't forget a rear adjuster if the trousers are belt-less and suspender-less self adjusting trousers.
really? seems like overkill. here in the US women use garter belts for that.