godofcoffee
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2009
- Messages
- 269
- Reaction score
- 2
Thank you
I'll consider starting that new thread. Not sure what the angle would be just yet.
I'm casting my vote with option #2. Parts of the interior do seem replaceable (I'm not sold on the cabinetry or most of the furnishings), but to an architectural innocent like myself it looks pretty nice. The landscaping costs must be a *****, though.
None of these houses are really McMansiony, although they're eclectic and a little pandering to modern tastes. The third place's columns don't really bother me - they seem sort of faux-Hudson Valley, which is in line with the rest of the architecture.