The WAYWT Discussion Thread

Originally Posted by syntonic

Click to expand...

What shoes (or boots) are these?

Crockett & Jones for Ralph Lauren 'Darlton' in shell cordovan.

Originally Posted by clark kent

Click to expand...

still awkward, but hopefully not as bad.

i like this.

i thought themselves was otter...

xx

synthese looks awesome; I like everything in that fit

Originally Posted by Cheese1

Click to expand...

Clothes aren't supposed to make you think of the other person naked. If that was the point, why would people wear clothes to begin with?

dunno man I see plenty of clothes that seem like they were meant for just that reason

hey aeglus need moar fits! loved your last one.

Originally Posted by Lane

Click to expand...

look here ******, dont you have a womens rights protest to attend?.

Originally Posted by Lane

Click to expand...

http://img2.moonbuggy.org/imgstore/what-the-****-am-i-reading.png

I actually really like the button-up in Synth's fit. With it on, the top's got a slight biz-cash feel, but then you look at the whole thing and it turns into slight biz-cash-gonna-****-yr-girl-in-the-office vibe.

The button-down and Cloak blazer are too fitting/structured compared to the free-flowing tee. I think the Cloak piece would complement the tee well, but the inclusion of the button-down in between those layers is creating this jarring wedge effect.

V neck/514

Originally Posted by engines

Click to expand...

V neck/514

I do not think that t-shirt does you any good

Originally Posted by APK

Click to expand...

You posted a few days ago that "anyone who thinks that dudes posting on a forum about fashion and style is girly or gay is an immature redneck." Yet you later vocalize your pity for Uncontrol, who "so obviously wants to be female." This assertion, by the way, is based on nothing other than his personal style. Unless you're an "immature redneck," your posts are non-cohesive contradictions...brotha.

So let me get this straight, you think that my view that being interested in how you look doesnt necessarily make you effeminate is contradictory to feeling pity for cross dressers/ transexuals? Not only does your conclusion (that i am somehow a hypocrate for holding these two completely seperate and unrelated beliefs) not follow from your flawed arguments, your conclusion doesnt even make sense. You know what seperates man from animals is our ability to reason, you should try it sometime....BROTHA.

From the parts you highlighted im also gathering you misread that quote (lack of reading comprehension again). I was not saying that people who read this forum are girly or gay, i was stating that precisely anyone who holds such an opinion (that style forumers are girly or gay soley by virtue of being members of style forum) is in fact an immature redneck. I never claimed uncontrol is effeminate by virtue of caring about how he looks and or being a member of styleforum. Uncontrol is effeminate according to the very definition of effeminate: looking and presumably acting feminine insofar as his actions include carying a purse, wearing tons of jewelry and wearing skin tight clothing. The picture that lane posted was of a man obviously dressed as a female, if you want to argue that dressing as a female doesnt make one effeminate but is rather merely a consequence of being on a forum about style and or caring about ones looks and dress, then you are obviously an idiot.

tl;dr

Originally Posted by Woodyear

Click to expand...

From the parts you highlighted im also gathering you misread that quote (lack of reading comprehension again). I was not saying that people who read this forum are girly or gay, i was stating that precisely anyone who holds such an opinion (that style forumers are girly or gay soley by virtue of being members of style forum) is in fact an immature redneck. I never claimed uncontrol is effeminate by virtue of caring about how he looks and or being a member of styleforum. Uncontrol is effeminate according to the very definition of effeminate: looking and presumably acting feminine insofar as his actions include carying a purse, wearing tons of jewelry and wearing skin tight clothing. The picture that lane posted was of a man obviously dressed as a female, if you want to argue that dressing as a female doesnt make one effeminate but is rather merely a consequence of being on a forum about style and or caring about ones looks and dress, then you are obviously an idiot.

Its my way of showing whats on the inside. Its like any other style here where people aspire to something. I'm communicating my inner me through this style, and I really could care less about how its perceived as "effemminate" to you. Lots of people dress in certain ways on here where they try to capture their personality because its simply to evoke something to others.