zjpj83
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2004
- Messages
- 9,425
- Reaction score
- 28
But how many of those have become true classics? Also a 2+2 does not necessarily translate to a Coupe Grand Tourer; my contention comes from the fact that this looks like Ferrari got jealous of the Panamera and wanted an "in" to "family supercars".
Again, they have made larger GT cars with back seats every single year for over 50 years. This is nothing new.
Judging from the pictures, I can't say I'm much of a fan of this car's styling, nor do I imagine I will be buying one.
But, that said, every time a new 2+2 comes out, amateur critics always come out of the woodwork and claim this isn't what Ferrari is "all about." That's just rubbish. Enzo Ferrari's whole idea was to make a diverse range of cars to appeal to different buyers. Some wanted lightweight cars they could race. Others wanted "family" cars or convertibles for cruising. It's equally irksome when people claim "real Ferraris have a V12" - of course, the list of successful Ferraris, both on and off the track, with V6 and V8 engines is extensive.
I don't know what you mean by "true classics." They are by and large not as valuable today as the pure race cars or GT cars with race history, but that's to be expected. Just as a McKim Mead & White shingle cottage isn't as valuable as a McKim Mead & White Newport mansion. It doesn't make these GT Ferraris any less part of a continuous history of the Ferrari marque.
And, by the way, the heavy, grand touring Ferrari America series (e.g. 340 America, 365 California Spider, 375 America, 410 Superamerica, 500 Superfast) are quite iconic and valuable today.