STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Agreed. I'm 6'3+ 200-205 and the L would've been too slim as well. Wish there was half an inch or so off the length, but I'm still thrilled with it.
I just received a Large Stark and it is very long in the sleeves and body. I'm 6'2, 175, 40 chest and it is slightly tight in the body (I'm sure it would stretch out fine) but the length and sleeves just won't work for me. I ordered it from CHCM on sale so I don't think I can return it.
Everybody in this thread should form the SF basketball team.
...Can we just settle for the SF rowing team? Xenox can be the coxswain. Per my earlier post, Stark in an S in Tag Brown. I'm 6'1", 160-ish.
People just don't realize how much that knit can stretch until they hold it IRL. I think that picture on the right does an excellent job at illustrating it. The Stark is not cut in a V shape with a much wider chest than waist - however, look at how it fits notwithit... The chest stretched all the way - without being uncomfortable.