• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

The Definitive MANBAG Thread Part I: 2009-2014

rach2jlc

Prof. Fabulous
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Mar 14, 2006
Messages
14,663
Reaction score
1,162
Originally Posted by Desi
Would be lying if I said that I wasn't feeling this bag. http://www.lanvin.com/e-lanvin/men/b...pping-bag.html
I like a lot of Lanvin's styles for bags, but I find the quality for the price to be so out of whack that I just have never brought myself to buy one. Crappy hardware, lackluster materials/linings, etc. Beyond that, I find a lot of them "droop" or fold oddly, or are hard to carry. For $595, I'm scared what that bag is actually like in person (this based on some of their $1595 bags for which I wouldn't pay $250.) If I saw it in person and could handle it for myself, that might be different, but I'd never buy a Lanvin bag sight unseen. Edit: IMHO, the worst "bang for buck" brands of the major players are Lanvin, Dior, Ferragamo, and Tod's. Not to say it's "junk," but when an $1800 bag has midgrade leather, cheap nylon lining, and chintzy YKK zippers, it hardly leaves me going "WOOOOW!" LV and Prada may be overpriced or garishly logo'd, but I still think quality-wise their $1500-2000 bags far outstrip these others.
 

rach2jlc

Prof. Fabulous
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Mar 14, 2006
Messages
14,663
Reaction score
1,162
Helmut Lang's new incarnation decided to add bags... wow... what in the world were they thinking? I decree these bags decidedly... Molluskular.
bagcraze_helmutlang_ss11_1.jpg
 

Master-Classter

Distinguished Member
Spamminator Moderator
Joined
Jul 18, 2007
Messages
8,366
Reaction score
1,236
I'd like to stuff that bag full of my junk, if you know what I mean....
Originally Posted by rach2jlc
Helmut Lang's new incarnation decided to add bags... wow... what in the world were they thinking? I decree these bags decidedly... Molluskular.
I've been looking everywhere, even for just a PICTURE, of a bag I could have sworn I saw a couple of years ago. I'm almost sure if was a Tumi, or Want Les Essentials, but maybe I was wrong. It looked a lot like a 257, quite rectangular, each of the corners had a leather sort of cap on it and a simple leather handle, no strap. The cool think was that it was a light yellow canvas with dark brown leather corner caps. I think the color was something like cornflower yellow or something... anyone?
 

indesertum

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Jun 7, 2007
Messages
17,396
Reaction score
3,888
Originally Posted by rach2jlc
I like a lot of Lanvin's styles for bags, but I find the quality for the price to be so out of whack that I just have never brought myself to buy one. Crappy hardware, lackluster materials/linings, etc. Beyond that, I find a lot of them "droop" or fold oddly, or are hard to carry.

For $595, I'm scared what that bag is actually like in person (this based on some of their $1595 bags for which I wouldn't pay $250.) If I saw it in person and could handle it for myself, that might be different, but I'd never buy a Lanvin bag sight unseen.

Edit: IMHO, the worst "bang for buck" brands of the major players are Lanvin, Dior, Ferragamo, and Tod's. Not to say it's "junk," but when an $1800 bag has midgrade leather, cheap nylon lining, and chintzy YKK zippers, it hardly leaves me going "WOOOOW!" LV and Prada may be overpriced or garishly logo'd, but I still think quality-wise their $1500-2000 bags far outstrip these others.


what would you say is best bang for buck?
 

pdsf

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2008
Messages
877
Reaction score
19
Originally Posted by Uncontrol
I can't buy something with the word "bean" in it.
What about Tornado Bean? Their new diffusion line...
smile.gif
Originally Posted by Master-Classter
I'd like to stuff that bag full of my junk, if you know what I mean.... I've been looking everywhere, even for just a PICTURE, of a bag I could have sworn I saw a couple of years ago. I'm almost sure if was a Tumi, or Want Les Essentials, but maybe I was wrong. It looked a lot like a 257, quite rectangular, each of the corners had a leather sort of cap on it and a simple leather handle, no strap. The cool think was that it was a light yellow canvas with dark brown leather corner caps. I think the color was something like cornflower yellow or something... anyone?
Doesn't sound like a Tumi... Re Want - I keep thinking that color combination sounded like something they did as a special edition for an online retailer? Argh...this is going to bug me! I could be wrong though...senility is setting in these days. Have you checked Selectism? Oh that Helmut bag is truly hideous. Poor Helmut seeing his name on this type of monstrosity. What a shame - the bags under his direction were very nice.
 

pdsf

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2008
Messages
877
Reaction score
19
^Yes, and Beanmamoto, Beanie Biyake, and wait for it....Beanrajuju. Back to bags
smile.gif
Any review on Ally Capellino? I like a few of her pieces, but some of the names are a bit off. "Dick" bag?! There's already a "Richard". I am in Hong Kong at the moment. Re bags - there is certainly more variety - for example, I have seen more interesting variations on duffle bags. Totes are defo more popular amongst men here vs the US.
 

tomorrowstars

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2007
Messages
304
Reaction score
3
I have a bag from here that I sort of fell out of love with. It turned out the style just wasn't for me. The quality, however, was impeccable for the price. EDIT: Found a picture of mine:
25yu1hz.jpg
 

pdsf

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2008
Messages
877
Reaction score
19
Their bags remind me of Saddleback.

The one you have looks similar to the one by Sir and Madame. There seems to be more leather satchels on the market these days. If you want something similar, you should have some good options.
 

ennui

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2008
Messages
801
Reaction score
22

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 91 37.4%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 90 37.0%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 26 10.7%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 40 16.5%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 38 15.6%

Forum statistics

Threads
506,853
Messages
10,592,491
Members
224,326
Latest member
uajmj15
Top