onix
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2009
- Messages
- 3,845
- Reaction score
- 30
who cares? its not classic but not boring either. looks more interesting than barker black.
this makes the difference:
Part of their monogram
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
who cares? its not classic but not boring either. looks more interesting than barker black.
These were on eBay recently. I had no idea what they were made of until I saw a stingray leather wallet for sale (non LV) with identical knobbly white patches. I think they look neat enough, but I wouldnt pay a grand for them. Then again, they sold for $300 plus change. (US size 13 IIRC.)
I can honestly say that there are no LV products in my wardrobe. There are none for a reason.
cause you BROKE
i got a Louis Vuitton shoe and i have to say its really beautifully made and stiched.. it looks and feel expensive
Most of my shoes came with Shoe Trees, but I would not say the Shoe Tree is free. It is a certainty that the price is already included.
I got a pair of their loafers years ago (no Logo, very subtle) and the leather feels great but after learning more about shoes I probably paid double what they are "worth". If I was to go out tomorrow and spend the same money I'd pick up three pairs of AEs on sale. See what SF does to you?
I've never seen an LV accessory without a logo. Pics of the loafers, please?