Shoe Damage Report & Shoe P0rn Central - Part II

Originally Posted by Son Of Saphir

Click to expand...

Me believe you.
thank you

Originally Posted by Son Of Saphir

Click to expand...

Me have high toe box in some older shoes, none look mess like that, not even close. Symptom of average fit and lesser quality leather could be.
the height of the toebox is a factor. asian feet tend to be rather flat in the forefoot. english made shoes mostly only have a half sockliner. if you don't compensate the height the logical effect are ripplings. another factor are the "wrong" trees. don't know about the leather quality of said shoes.

Originally Posted by artoftime

Click to expand...

Have been rocking teh Vash Budapester lately...the look is growing on me... the quality and comfort are first rate.

a classic

Originally Posted by fritzl

Click to expand...

the height of the toebox is a factor.

asian feet tend to be rather flat in the forefoot. english made shoes mostly only have a half insole. if you don't compensate the height the logical effect are ripplings.

another factor are the "wrong" trees.

don't know about the leather quality of said shoes.

Do you really believe this? Was this knowledge shared by more than yourself before you made this post?

Originally Posted by srivats

Click to expand...

Care to explain why? I see two pairs of shoes well worn and well-cared-for by the owners. The antiquing does not look artificial at all.

Here are some better pictures from the LS website:

It's Fritzl. He does not like anything that can't take some hay in them.

Originally Posted by kolecho

Click to expand...

It's Fritzl. He does not like anything that can't take some hay in them.


very very funny comment.

Originally Posted by HORNS

Click to expand...

Do you really believe this? Was this knowledge shared by more than yourself before you made this post?

S T F U

Originally Posted by kolecho

Click to expand...

It's Fritzl. He does not like anything that can't take some hay in them.

It's kolecho.

whatever floats your boat...

Originally Posted by fritzl

Click to expand...

thank you
asian feet tend to be rather flat in the forefoot.

Zo, fritzl - the inscrutable Asian feet, eh?

Originally Posted by jhcam8

Click to expand...

Zo, fritzl - the inscrutable Asian feet, eh?

eh, who said that, eh... gosh

Boy it is tough having a different taste on this forum. The groupthink police will not rest until every single dissident is taken down !

Originally Posted by gdl203

Click to expand...

Boy it is tough having a different taste on this forum. The groupthink police will not rest until every single dissident is taken down !
nothing wrong with groupthink, but not when people are clueless i.e. vass belongs to the austro-hungarian school like Scheer, Materna, Balint etc.,... ...and wear AE seconds i'm also not the guy, who has a problem to find shoes that fit... btw, my difference in taste is smaller than most might think, so what?

Originally Posted by fritzl

Click to expand...

asian feet tend to be rather flat in the forefoot. english made shoes mostly only have a half insole. if you don't compensate the height the logical effect are ripplings.

another factor are the "wrong" trees.



Voilá!

What caused those ripples, 'Asian feet', 'half an insole' (what's that?) or 'wrong trees'?

Originally Posted by gdl203

Click to expand...

Boy it is tough having a different taste on this forum. The groupthink police will not rest until every single dissident is taken down !

I don't think it's the dissent, it's just that fritzl only likes one type of shoe, thinks that only that one type of shoe looks best regardless of the outfit and also make some bizarre fit/construction comments over and over. There are many things favored by the forum that I do not like, but I don't beat people over the head with it.

Originally Posted by edmorel

Click to expand...

I don't think it's the dissent, it's just that fritzl only likes one type of shoe, thinks that only that one type of shoe looks best regardless of the outfit and also make some bizarre fit/construction comments over and over. There are many things favored by the forum that I do not like, but I don't beat people over the head with it.
sorry, but you should know better... it's an interpretation and i can tell you it is not true. i.e. i like button boots, chelseas, jodhpurs, norweger, budapester, laxenburger, etc. beside my favorite style. true is, that i make comments with tongue in cheek... you don't beat people. that's the joke of the century thanks for playing

Originally Posted by edmorel

Click to expand...

I don't think it's the dissent, it's just that fritzl only likes one type of shoe, thinks that only that one type of shoe looks best regardless of the outfit and also make some bizarre fit/construction comments over and over. There are many things favored by the forum that I do not like, but I don't beat people over the head with it.

It seems to be super and within the behavioral rules of the forum to say you love something, that it looks fantastic and is making you drool. It doesn't seem OK to say that you don't like something or that it looks off to you, unless it's the kind of stuff that the groupthink agrees is despicable (Kenneth Cole lol, JAB suits rofl) . As soon as you voice one contrarian view, seven dudes (including 5 noobs) will jump on your back asking you to break down your position over the next two pages: what do you mean? what exactly don't you like? this is not true sir! to finally conclude that, well, this is an opinon (personal preference) - duh!

Next time someone posts that he likes something, let's all make sure we ask him to explain why and according to what objective rules of aesthetic this statement could possibly hold. If possible, using lines and circles on photos and diagrams.

Regarding fritzl, I think by now it should be pretty clear to us what he likes and dislikes, no? Why always jump on him every time he voices these same opinions ?