STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
I wouldn't either.
In theory, these clothes SHOULD look "good", because hell, they're "fancy" and burn holes in wallets.
My opinions were open-ended and said with the least bit of hostility . I just stated things that were clear as day. Can anyone refute the opinions I made? Instead, tell me why exactly the fit is deemed a good fit so that I'll at least have a broad understanding. Don't simply resort to "my e-dick is bigger than yours, I don't need to explain ****."
you dont get the aesthetic when you ask someone to explain to you why its a good fit. i'm not a fan of rick owens-y stuff, but it seems that alot of the appeal comes from playing with proportions and doing something that doesn't look classically styled.
please. it might look OK if krunk was 20, skinny, and angelically beautiful. but he's this short, beefy, practically middle-aged guy, who has the look of a carpenter or plumber, trying to shoehorn his body and his life into clothes he will never "fit"... it's sad, when you think about it.
I thought kunk was over 6' tall.
i forget where i was going with this, i had more to type but whatever
please. it might look OK if krunk was 20, skinny, and angelically beautiful. but he's this short, beefy, practically middle-aged guy, who has the look of a carpenter or plumber, trying to shoehorn his body and his life into clothes he will never "fit"... it's sad, when you think about it.