toothsomesound
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2008
- Messages
- 5,096
- Reaction score
- 440
Let me know how it goes, I don't have the cash to take it off your hands right now but hopefully in a few weeks...
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
That's literally Dior 17.5cm level tapering, so hoping that measurement is off or it's for the sleeve or something. I need like 7.5 inches on a dress pant to have it not look stupid
6.6" refers indeed to the leg opening and is not unusual for a Raf Simons suit, even though Yoox's measurements aren't always dead-on. I've tried two different Raf Simons suits so far ( one from Yoox in size 48 ) and none of them measured more than 7.0" at the hem. But, yeah... "With at end" is quite inarticulate. When I switch to the German Yoox site and check the exactly same suit it says "Saumunfang", which translates to "hem circumference" though and should clear up your doubts...
Thanks for the information. I'd go with the one you linked, but unfortunately I'm a 36 / 46 Euro. I just switched over to the Japanese site, and they listed the hem as 17cm, which is slightly more forgiving and in line with some other slim pants I own. I'll just have to wait for it to arrive
Are Raf suits similar to what he does for Jil design/construction/fit wise?
thinkin' about picking up a DVN suit. anyone know if DVN has a consistent drop? :]
no, raf suits after f/w 07 are made like ****. no comparison.
Most I've seen has been 6in iirc, but DLester could confirm
Are these too ridiculous?