• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Random Food Questions Thread

why

Distinguished Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2007
Messages
9,505
Reaction score
368
Originally Posted by HORNS
How so? Unless the oil circulates to allow a maximum temperature difference between the food and the oil, transmission of energy from the heat source to the food being cooked can be slowed.
When the environment is at a fixed temperature? If anything, increased diffusion through permeation while submerged in water would decrease cooking time, but I don't think the different properties of density alone between water and oil is any more than negligible in this context.
 

ChicagoRon

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2007
Messages
6,147
Reaction score
161
Originally Posted by why
When the environment is at a fixed temperature? If anything, increased diffusion through permeation while submerged in water would decrease cooking time, but I don't think the different properties of diffusion alone between water and oil is any more than negligible in this context.
Shall we consult Harald McGee?
 

why

Distinguished Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2007
Messages
9,505
Reaction score
368
Originally Posted by ChicagoRon
Shall we consult Harald McGee?
Not really. I mean, I realize the difference in density will affect conductivity within water itself, but I'm not sure if overall heat transfer would decrease very much due to density difference between water and oil at such low temperatures. I think oil also has viscosity and molecular size working against it in terms of overall heat transfer. That's not to say that density isn't a factor at all, but I'm just saying that there are other factors involved, especially in regards heat transfer between miscible and inmiscible substances.
 

why

Distinguished Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2007
Messages
9,505
Reaction score
368
I just thought of water's higher thermal expansion coefficient than lipids, so I wonder really how much difference there is in density between water and oil at 180 degrees. I'm going to drop some butter in 180 degree water and see what happens compared to when it's dropped in chilled water.
laugh.gif
 

Johnny_5

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 14, 2007
Messages
4,192
Reaction score
5
Originally Posted by gomestar
we do ours in a low simmer and they come out superb. Also, we boil the eggs in shell for 30 seconds, shock, and then crack into the water.

Interesting, I've never thought of trying that even though it seems so simple. Does it maintain the shape of the egg, or just keep the egg in one piece instead of it dissipating throughout the water? Poached eggs are a beautiful thing....
 

why

Distinguished Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2007
Messages
9,505
Reaction score
368
180 degrees is too low of a temperature to change the density of water much.
frown.gif
 

Piobaire

Not left of center?
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
81,835
Reaction score
63,365
Much confusion over cooking sausages.

Fat breaks at about 160-165. As Kyle said, a good sausage is a careful mixture of meat with fat suspended in it. So the goal is to cook the meat and brown the casing while not rendering much of the fat out. In fact, something like a thuringer, you should still see little pieces of backfat suspended in the meat.
drool.gif


Medium-low saute in a covered pan for me. Don't let the skin burst but I will stick a Thermapen in to check temps. Natural casings will quickly seal a little pin hole like that. I bring to internal temp of 155 with the natural casings nicely browned. Nothing like the perfect texture of a sausage you stuffed with the snap of a well cooked natural casing when you bite into it.
 

gomestar

Super Yelper
Joined
Oct 21, 2008
Messages
19,880
Reaction score
4,474
This is a dumb question, but think of it as a free bump. I'm making scallops from Ad Hoc this weekend. However, I don't have a steel fry pan like he suggests using (it's on my purchase list). Should I use either my Le Creuset cast iron fry pan or an All-Clad stainless sauce pan (would obviously not crowd them while cooking)?
 

Piobaire

Not left of center?
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
81,835
Reaction score
63,365
Originally Posted by gomestar
This is a dumb question, but think of it as a free bump. I'm making scallops from Ad Hoc this weekend. However, I don't have a steel fry pan like he suggests using (it's on my purchase list). Should I use either my Le Creuset cast iron fry pan or an All-Clad stainless sauce pan (would obviously not crowd them while cooking)?

I would pick the stainless as I've noticed my sole Le Creuset doesn't seem to like to quickly sear/brown things. I don't know if that recipe calls for doing the scallops like that, but if so, there's my advice.
 

itsstillmatt

The Liberator
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Messages
13,969
Reaction score
2,086
Originally Posted by gomestar
This is a dumb question, but think of it as a free bump. I'm making scallops from Ad Hoc this weekend. However, I don't have a steel fry pan like he suggests using (it's on my purchase list). Should I use either my Le Creuset cast iron fry pan or an All-Clad stainless sauce pan (would obviously not crowd them while cooking)?
Cast iron. What kind of steel does he suggest? Black steel is pretty much the same as cast iron. Stainless is different. Stainless also kind of sucks. I use black steel for almost everything. Love it.
 

kwilkinson

Having a Ball
Joined
Nov 21, 2007
Messages
32,245
Reaction score
884
Originally Posted by Piobaire
I would pick the stainless as I've noticed my sole Le Creuset doesn't seem to like to quickly sear/brown things. I don't know if that recipe calls for doing the scallops like that, but if so, there's my advice.
If your cast iron pan can't sear, that's pretty fuckin lame.
 

gomestar

Super Yelper
Joined
Oct 21, 2008
Messages
19,880
Reaction score
4,474
Originally Posted by Piobaire
I would pick the stainless as I've noticed my sole Le Creuset doesn't seem to like to quickly sear/brown things.

really? Are you sure it's hot enough? It does take longer to reach a higher temperature. I find my Le Creuset to be fantastic for a quick sear/brown and use it routinely for anything braised.

Originally Posted by iammatt
Cast iron. What kind of steel does he suggest? Black steel is pretty much the same as cast iron. Stainless is different. Stainless also kind of sucks. I use black steel for almost everything. Love it.

he suggests to NOT use non-stick for a good sear/crisp outside, and instead stainless. I believe the picture is just an All-Clad fry pan.



I'm just curious since I don't want the high sides of the stainless pan to change the way they cook or anything. My initial plan was the cast iron.
 

HORNS

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Apr 24, 2008
Messages
18,391
Reaction score
9,000
Originally Posted by kwilkinson
If your cast iron pan can't sear, that's pretty fuckin lame.

Yeah, Lame-o!!!

Seriously, though, Pio, is the inside of the Le Cruset enameled? My unenameled Lodge is the most nonstick pan I have when it's preheated. I also have a classic steel pan, but like what Matt said, they behave the same.
 

kwilkinson

Having a Ball
Joined
Nov 21, 2007
Messages
32,245
Reaction score
884
Originally Posted by gomestar
really? Are you sure it's hot enough? It does take longer to reach a higher temperature. I find my Le Creuset to be fantastic for a quick sear/brown and use it routinely for anything braised.



he suggests to NOT use non-stick for a good sear/crisp outside, and instead stainless. I believe the picture is just an All-Clad fry pan.



I'm just curious since I don't want the high sides of the stainless pan to change the way they cook or anything. My initial plan was the cast iron.


Black steel =! nonstick. They are usually made of carbon/steel alloy. They are truly ideal for searing but don't get washed like regular pans. Instead, they get seasoned the same way a cast iron pan does. They are generally inexpensive, you might look into one.
 

gomestar

Super Yelper
Joined
Oct 21, 2008
Messages
19,880
Reaction score
4,474
Originally Posted by kwilkinson
Black steel =! nonstick. They are usually made of carbon/steel alloy. They are truly ideal for searing but don't get washed like regular pans. Instead, they get seasoned the same way a cast iron pan does. They are generally inexpensive, you might look into one.

sounds interesting. I'll take a look sometime, but I need a bigger Le Creuset and a bigger stock pot first.
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 91 37.6%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 90 37.2%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 25 10.3%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 40 16.5%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 38 15.7%

Forum statistics

Threads
506,849
Messages
10,592,393
Members
224,327
Latest member
ZenCortexHurry
Top