millionaire75
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2007
- Messages
- 914
- Reaction score
- 2
Agree with what everyone said regarding luck. Plays a very big part.
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
more than anything else it comes to attitude / persistence.
more than anything else it comes to attitude / persistence.
There are many rags to riches stories out there of people who didnt have 'luck' in terms of what they were born into but still managed to become quite successful.
There are surprisingly fewer of those stories than you might think, actually. I say surprisingly, because I too once thought as you did on this issue. When you peel back the layers on most "rags to riches" stories (professional athletics aside), quite a few common factors tend to emerge: family connections, luck of being born in certain parts of certain time periods, middle to upper-middle-class beginnings (hardly "rags" as we commonly think of them), special access to a key resource that was not afforded to peers in similar circumstances, and strong mentor figures willing to take chances on the up-and-comer. All of these stars had to align at precisely the right times. That's not to discount the role of intelligence or hard work, obviously. You can get all the lucky breaks in the world and be a total idiot, and your idiocy will prevail over your good fortune. But conversely, you can be really bright, really well socialized, really hard working, and really unlucky -- and because of that bad luck (or really, lack of extraordinary luck), you will not succeed.
Incidentally this can be absolutely self taught, and can counter an upbringing which didn't foster it.
Actually I just posted about attitude, 2 posts or so above you. It's good to see my thoughts are read
...
Am I the only one here who thinks the views expressed on "luck" and its importance are borderline absudist? 50 years ago you couldnt have coco krispies for breakfast. This day in age a farmer milks a cow sending that off to some homogenization plant; while in a factory some towns away some machinery is toasting rice grains and adding some "chocolate flavored substance" as some lady in a hairnet watches. The milk is bottled and sent to grocery store where it will sit a couple isles from that aforementioned rice cereal after its been weighed, bagged, and boxed. Meanwhile after making the trip to the grocers I managed not get myself killed by either purposeful action or sheer randomness. The Breakfast Stars have aligned it would seem. How "lucky" am I be eating coco krispies this morning?
You can fail at one firm, move onto another and succeed there.