• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Post your photography skills! (self-gloss)

mr. burns

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2008
Messages
442
Reaction score
140
4277779363_17c32705cd_o.jpg
 

bigboy

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2009
Messages
288
Reaction score
1

Roy

Distinguished Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2004
Messages
1,039
Reaction score
31
I made this in Alaska... Because of this i'm now learning to fly small planes, lovin' it!
IMG_0701.jpg
 

TRINI

Distinguished Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2006
Messages
9,006
Reaction score
658
Originally Posted by mr. burns
4277779363_17c32705cd_o.jpg


What equipment are you using? great pics, btw
 

EMY

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2010
Messages
258
Reaction score
2
dsc7270bw.jpg


typical southern california weather
 

mr. burns

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2008
Messages
442
Reaction score
140
awesome sky the other day. took these while driving lol.

ontheroad-2.jpg


ontheroad.jpg
 

zorglubb

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2009
Messages
148
Reaction score
16
Originally Posted by DBowers
Never had formal training. Here are some picture I took on a recent trip to Iceland (with a used Lumix LX2) and loved. I would appreciate any critique.

d1-church-hallgrimskirkja10.jpg



Like your pics taken in Iceland
wink.gif
, did you travel a lot during your trip?

I've taken some pics of this church my self,

2192689577_979b83a5db.jpg


2192687871_ac3f4e905c.jpg
 

Nantucket Red

"Mr. Fashionista"
Joined
Mar 10, 2006
Messages
5,380
Reaction score
23
Originally Posted by mccvi
NR- 50 summilux pre-asph (i found i prefer non-asph for portraits - along with a pre-war summitar) and, yes, the m8 (though i use the m6 as well). I picked up the m8 when we had our daughter 6 months ago (the pic is a friend's son), but i am missing film.

your pic is beautiful as well (i spent a little time in camden - not sure if it's close to bailey island), i've been wanting to get a wider angle than my 28, and your 21 shows why.

please post more pics - we need more leica folks on here (especially the presence of an mp shooter).


I agree about the pre-asph 50 Summilux for portraits. It has an almost magical 3-D effect with a sort of shallow bowl-shaped field of focus. Here are some street portraits I've shot with the MP and 50 Summilux.

3465132971_99b337dba6_b.jpg


Kanamara matsuri, Kodachrome 64.

3917746378_0a396d3eb3_b.jpg


Tomioka Hachiman matsuri, Kodachrome 25 PKM.

3917751652_c5b18d7848_b.jpg


Same as above.
 

Crane's

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2008
Messages
6,190
Reaction score
518
I really like the shallow depth of field on these portrait shots. Back in the day when I was using a film camera I had a Canon 50mm f1.2 lens that was awesome for portraits. These days the closest thing I've found that shoots really shallow are the Zeiss 85mm or 135mm at f1.8. Really nice glass but are they expensive.

I've been mulling over shooting some film again. There are just some things that turn out better with film not to mention it requires much more thought to get it right. Ahhh the good old days of shooting real color IR. I digress.
 

Nantucket Red

"Mr. Fashionista"
Joined
Mar 10, 2006
Messages
5,380
Reaction score
23
Originally Posted by Crane's
I really like the shallow depth of field on these portrait shots. Back in the day when I was using a film camera I had a Canon 50mm f1.2 lens that was awesome for portraits. These days the closest thing I've found that shoots really shallow are the Zeiss 85mm or 135mm at f1.8. Really nice glass but are they expensive.

I've been mulling over shooting some film again. There are just some things that turn out better with film not to mention it requires much more thought to get it right. Ahhh the good old days of shooting real color IR. I digress.


The shallow DoF in that light was made possible by shooting ISO 64 and 25 (ah, Kodachrome!), which allowed me to shoot wide open at 1.4. Wide open is where Leica glass like the Summilux really shines.

I have long coveted the Zeiss ZF 85 1.4 for my Nikons, but have so far not talked myself into parting with $1k for it.

As for film, 2010 is Kodachrome's 75th birthday and the last year it will be processed. I have enough in my fridge to shoot 9 rolls a month throughout the year.
 

Listi

Distinguished Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2008
Messages
2,858
Reaction score
58
Just stumbled across this thread. Love photography, but haven't done any for a few years. Hoping to start again after I get my bsc.
r8uqde.jpg
seaqf4.jpg
Nikon FA, kodak 200 iirc, 35mm, processed/developed by myself.
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 91 37.4%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 90 37.0%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 26 10.7%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 40 16.5%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 38 15.6%

Forum statistics

Threads
506,853
Messages
10,592,468
Members
224,327
Latest member
WealthBrainCode2
Top