- Joined
- Feb 11, 2007
- Messages
- 26,710
- Reaction score
- 9,853
Voted for myself...at least then me and IamMatt can agree on something.
Oy. You're not allowed to be gracious! Jeezus, now I feel bad about voting for Moo.
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Voted for myself...at least then me and IamMatt can agree on something.
If he were just a fun kicking post, I'd be sympathetic--in fact, I'd probably stick up for him. However, he's not nearly so passive or innocent as that.
there is bad taste and there is bad fit, we should be clear what we are voting on. This will come as a shock but, recently, I do not think Moo's taste has been bad, but his fit has (I have not seen his cemetery outfit). KB is another one where it is more the fit than the taste, exotic skin shoes not withstanding. For me, if I were to vote, which I am not, I would look at it from the perspective of who on the list has the least amount, if any, of clothing that I would wear. There are others not on this list that would get my vote before any of those on it.
Oh yes, what a terrible thing to wear to a cemetery.
there is bad taste and there is bad fit, we should be clear what we are voting on. This will come as a shock but, recently, I do not think Moo's taste has been bad, but his fit has (I have not seen his cemetery outfit). KB is another one where it is more the fit than the taste, exotic skin shoes not withstanding. For me, if I were to vote, which I am not, I would look at it from the perspective of who on the list has the least amount, if any, of clothing that I would wear. There are others not on this list that would get my vote before any of those on it.
Foo, you are the instigator in every one of our chats. You always talk **** about my clothes (I don't care how you put it - you're talking **** and you and I both know you wouldn't say **** in "real life"), and I always come back with "I can alter the jacket but you can't alter your height." I'm really good at just plodding away, so as long as you bring the hate, I'll bring the lulz.
I want to like and respect you, and I understand that Moo is a fun kicking-post, but god you're an insufferable dick sometimes.
That's what you don't get: I'm not just "talking ****." You've been around here long enough to know that I am nothing if not frank. That you can't understand the difference between talking about someone's clothes on a clothing forum and sad attempts at personal insults continues to baffle me. And good god, I hope you aren't confused about the difference between Styleforum and real life.
There is no different between making fun of someone's height or their clothing: both are personally insulting.
What baffles me is the amount of time you spend making fun of other peoples' clothing, while rarely saying anything positive about anything posted in WAYWRN. And yes, Foo, no matter how you twist it 200 posts about a bespoke suit, or constantly picking at tiny details in my fits is a way of making fun of the way something fits. Your agenda as an angry clothing snob is crystal clear. What isn't clear is why you portray yourself as such online when not being like this in "real life". If you're claiming a large variance between your online persona and your real life persona, than you're just a fake dude.