• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

J. Gordon Holt grows up

A Y

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2006
Messages
6,084
Reaction score
1,038
Originally Posted by Artisan Fan
Wrong.
frown.gif


Please prove that I'm wrong.

--Andre
 

For Brutus

Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2009
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Originally Posted by A Y
Actually, the opposite is true: we can easily measure far more than we can hear. The real problems are either digging the right information out of a mountain of data, or accidentally throwing it away.

--Andre


I think it's some of what you said, and more. We can measure a lot but we don't always know what is important and what isn't, a lack of understanding. We probably also are missing somethings that we should measure.
 

A Y

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2006
Messages
6,084
Reaction score
1,038
Originally Posted by For Brutus
I think it's some of what you said, and more. We can measure a lot but we don't always know what is important and what isn't, a lack of understanding. We probably also are missing somethings that we should measure.
That sounds right to me. The reason we miss some things we should measure is not because we can't measure it, but because of a lack of understanding. --Andre
 

Artisan Fan

Suitsupply-sider
Joined
Jul 17, 2006
Messages
32,197
Reaction score
379
Originally Posted by For Brutus
I think it's some of what you said, and more. We can measure a lot but we don't always know what is important and what isn't, a lack of understanding. We probably also are missing somethings that we should measure.

This.
 

Artisan Fan

Suitsupply-sider
Joined
Jul 17, 2006
Messages
32,197
Reaction score
379
Originally Posted by A Y
That sounds right to me. The reason we miss some things we should measure is not because we can't measure it, but because of a lack of understanding.

--Andre


True but then at the end of the day we have not fully captured the audio experience. The best approach I believe is a combination of subjective and objective tests.
 

For Brutus

Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2009
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
This is why I agree with Mr Holt. Measurements are important because they can help us understand what is really going on. However, we shouldn't ignore actually using our ears. We may not be able describe in physics terms what we are hearing but we often are rather sensitive to small changes.

Of course the problem with trusting just our hearing is the way we can precieve the same thing differently under different conditions. Our brains can also be tricked. As a visual analogy look at optical illusions. The two lines are the same length but our brian says otherwise. And of course the plasebo affect is real. I was disgusted when I saw a website claiming great things if you used their ceramic speaker wire supports to lift your wires off the ground. These "custom made" ceramic things were nothing more than insulators used on power lines. They likely cost the power company $2-3 each. This site was asking something like $50 or $90 each. Sadly that sort of stuff does give audio a bad name.
 

Artisan Fan

Suitsupply-sider
Joined
Jul 17, 2006
Messages
32,197
Reaction score
379
Originally Posted by For Brutus
This is why I agree with Mr Holt. Measurements are important because they can help us understand what is really going on. However, we shouldn't ignore actually using our ears. We may not be able describe in physics terms what we are hearing but we often are rather sensitive to small changes.

Of course the problem with trusting just our hearing is the way we can precieve the same thing differently under different conditions. Our brains can also be tricked. As a visual analogy look at optical illusions. The two lines are the same length but our brian says otherwise. And of course the plasebo affect is real. I was disgusted when I saw a website claiming great things if you used their ceramic speaker wire supports to lift your wires off the ground. These "custom made" ceramic things were nothing more than insulators used on power lines. They likely cost the power company $2-3 each. This site was asking something like $50 or $90 each. Sadly that sort of stuff does give audio a bad name.


Agreed. My friend actually found these insulators at Home Depot for cheap $. Just needed to cut off the wood screw on the bottom.
 

A Y

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2006
Messages
6,084
Reaction score
1,038
Originally Posted by For Brutus
This is why I agree with Mr Holt. Measurements are important because they can help us understand what is really going on. However, we shouldn't ignore actually using our ears. We may not be able describe in physics terms what we are hearing but we often are rather sensitive to small changes.

I agree with this, too. Listening is used to validate measurements, and measurements are used to make sure what you heard is repeatable. Where a lot of audio companies fall down is the rigor with which they apply these two tools.

--Andre
 

Artisan Fan

Suitsupply-sider
Joined
Jul 17, 2006
Messages
32,197
Reaction score
379
Originally Posted by A Y
I agree with this, too. Listening is used to validate measurements, and measurements are used to make sure what you heard is repeatable. Where a lot of audio companies fall down is the rigor with which they apply these two tools.

--Andre


I don't disagree with this, however it seems to be getting better with the more established brands like Wilson, Levinson, Revel, ARC, C-J, etc.
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 91 37.4%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 90 37.0%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 26 10.7%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 40 16.5%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 38 15.6%

Forum statistics

Threads
506,853
Messages
10,592,480
Members
224,326
Latest member
uajmj15
Top