SField
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2008
- Messages
- 6,139
- Reaction score
- 24
let's take the hamburger. what is a hamburger like? i'm talking about a hamburger a poor person would buy, not the $12 burger at a pub. how fresh is the meat? what preservatives are in the bread? how about the mustard and ketchup? made at home or in a factory? (and the fake cheese!)
good chili takes a lot of time and good ingredients to make. i doubt you can sell it that cheap as to be eaten by peasants. are peasants in new england eating fresh seafood all the time? if so, you win.
Ehh, have you ever met an actual fisherman? Have you ever actually gone to the fisheries and met these people? I certainly did, once with Eric Ripert. Many small communities in Alaska, New England and Nova Scotia (think Peggy's Cove) have extremely modest families eating something that was swimming or crawling on the ocean floor a few moments prior. Same as you'll have people in Omaha eating pretty decent beef, not to mention all the rural communities in the northern midwest and many parts of PA which benefit from Amish farmers.
Chili is time intensive. So is a proper tandoori or curry, or coq au vin or anything else. That doesn't mean poor people can't eat something that isn't time intensive. Do you not realize that in fact, many of the most time intensive techniques and recipes are in fact from poorer people? When you have a tough cut of meat and inferior product to deal with, you need more cooking time to get something great. It's a common thread in the food of poor people. We've gotten many of our modern day high end classics from peasant food, so when I say peasant food, it isn't a pejorative term.
In the south a housewife will get up early in the morning to make a brisket. You aren't proving any points. A lot of the best hamburgers are at places like Louis Lunch or a diner in some truck stop in Indiana. It's one of the best foods anyone has come up with, which is why everyone on Ferran Adria to Morimoto has done something with it.