tonio028
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2008
- Messages
- 4,777
- Reaction score
- 1,188
But they can do both! I wouldn't expect them to do it to all their pants--just the ones that are billed as "slim fit." For men with tiny bird legs and no ass, J. Crew pants fit like ****. Their slim fit pants are great below the knee, but the ass and thighs could fit two, perhaps three Asian men comfortably. You old farts can have your classic, regular, giant, officer, surplus, etc. All I ask for is one pair of pants with sensible proportions for a man with a 30 inch waist, no ass, and skinny thighs. As it is now, I have to have all my J. Crew pants altered in the seat so I don't look like I crapped myself. I don't care what your aesthetic priorities are, dumpy ass pants are just not flattering.
Also: No one has tried out their Ludlow suit? I think I might order one and give it a shot. If anyone else is interested I can report back with my data.
Couldn't agree more with respect to seat and and thighs in need of some slimming on the "slim" and supposedly "slim through the seat and thigh" classic fits, etc.
With regards to the Ludlow suiting, I've tried it on in the store a few times. What exactly are you looking for? Assuming fit, I normally wear a US 36R suit and the smallest size in store I always see is a 38. Considering it was supposed to be slim, I tried it and I would say they run true, slim, but not slim enough for me, typical J.Crew slim if you know what I mean. The shoulders were noticeably a better fit than the Albridge suit in the same size though. I'm sure a 36 would have fit me better, but I couldn't do the comparison. With regards to quality, they were nice. Nothing to rave about, but on sale, I would probably give them a buy.