- Joined
- Mar 14, 2006
- Messages
- 14,663
- Reaction score
- 1,162
^because you're also sexually questionable?
I think every **** on the forum is hoping this is the case.
And we're ALL here to help him through his transition.
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
^because you're also sexually questionable?
^because you're also sexually questionable?
In short, really how do men "go about" actually having a relationship with each other that isn't affected, isn't reactionary, or isn't a parallel/mirror image of straight relationships, only that it is between men?
Straight relationships are so varied that if you try and shun everything that is a mirror image of straight relationships, you don't have many possibilities left.
If you've simply neglected to include a smilie here, then nm.
I like Why more and more.
They need to take into account what makes them unique, what works for them, and create their own rules of formation rather than just try to adopt in one motion relationships that weren't created/formed/conceptualized "for them."
I don't really know what you mean. How is that different from any relationship, straight or not? Apart from traditional marriage, I don't see what "rules" there are to avoid actually.
I just mean that the way in which we can conceptualize or think of relationships in general... gay, straight, or anything else... are not neutral and not based simply on your own individual "feelings."
I think you think too much. I don't know why the fact that gays (and straights, and bi, and so on) can have individual relationships based on what works for the individuals concerned does not have to rely on a conceptualization such as the one you describe.I'm saying that we are seeing now a changing of how men view themselves and their relationships with other men.
What? Then I don't want anything to do with it!And, I can tell you that it probably won't be about shiny lip gloss, pink Hollister tees, and Musical renditions of "Miss Saigon."
I like to think that this is not the case, or ought not ot be. Somewhat naive, I guess.
^because you're also sexually questionable?
I have my moments, but the guy would have to be either THUPER butch, or THUPER fay, there could be no middle ground.
I think you think too much. I don't know why the fact that gays (and straights, and bi, and so on) can have individual relationships based on what works for the individuals concerned does not have to rely on a conceptualization such as the one you describe.
Wait.