huy
Senior Member
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2008
- Messages
- 238
- Reaction score
- 0
Expensive/designer clothes look and feel much better than the cheap stuff, I'd think it's fairly obvious.
If we are talking about a $5000 suit compared to a $200 suit, then yes the difference will be obvious. If we are talking about a $5000 OTR suit versus a $2000 OTR suit the differences are very hard to see if there are any differences. Just like a $200 fake Rolex will be different than a real Rolex.
A Rolex has a function of rotation 3 arrows. It is a very easy task to replicate, and the cost of replicating this task has the following relationship: accurate time measurement and small "sliding" over time - costs 10$-40$ VERY accurate time measurement with VERY small "sliding over time - costs 5000$-25000$
People who want to have accurate time would get a quartz, not a mechanical watch. People who buy $5000 watches do not buy it for their time accuracy but for design, quality and name. A certain level of accuracy is expected for all mechanical watches and price does not always reflect the accuracy. You can easily get a $400 Stowa that will be as accurate as the Rolex.
The technology and the professional input is different (Rolex has better professionals more expensive materials then Timex) in different quality watches. Unlike suits where a bad job means a terrible fit, in watches a cheap/bad design will simply mean this: You re-correct your watch every 5 months, not every 5 years (like a great watch that was designed to be very precise.) The penalty for a poor design here is almost negligible(do you care that you correct your watch twice a year and not twice in 10 years?) unlike a fake suit.
A bad movement in your watch means that it will not run for years in addition to being very inaccurate. To compare watch movement to suit is better to compare it to the sewing and not the fit. The suit is probably poorly sewn at the buttons and will end up falling off.
Now moving onto design. There is a a saying "not all that is shiny is gold," in terms of fakes it doesn't really matter. Rolex doesn't use top grade diamonds that are impossible to replicate. Rolex uses small amount of high quality(correct me on this?) gold, steel, titanium, glass. In the amount that is needed for a watch, a person that designs a good fake can buy all of these materials (the exact same ones) for the cost that would still allow him to sell his fakes for under 200$. Even if Rolex has some secret metal formula that has a super gold mix, using a close enough gold will make no difference whatsoever in the design. It will look and feel the same.
Raw material costs for all luxury items are low compared to its price. Does the raw materials used to make a Kiton or Valentino suit even cost $200 to buy? I highly doubt that it does. There are a lot more costs involved in manufacturing something that just the raw costs.
Rolex can be disassembled into parts that are later put together. For example we take the inner metal ring. The person making the watch doesn't need years of experience of sewing Valentino suits (to make a great Valentino suit) to master this, he simply needs to take a ruler and measure a 2cm diameter 1/2 gold, 1/2 steel 0.2 thick. After putting together all the parts, if the person has some experience dealing with watches it will be a very close resemblance. Here he doesn't need a hand of a painter or a pianist he just needs some good equipment.
Using your same logic, a fake suit can be made the same way as a fake Rolex. It does not require a person who has years of experience making a Valentino suit to sew a suit that is very close to resembling the real thing. As long as the person is familiar with sewing suits and has good equipment it should turn out almost like the real thing.