Cool The Kid
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2010
- Messages
- 4,579
- Reaction score
- 541
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
No offense taken. I enjoy discussing these types of issues with others, and I've always admired your tact around here.
You're giving far too much power and credence to the idea that "you are what you think." There are thoughts, and there are thoughts. Your take on thought/free will also gives rise to beliefs that, for example, there are no accidents (where people are concerned, anyway). Well yes, there are. And just because a person experiences a thought does not convert it into some sort of instantaneous reality.There isn't a thing we do that doesn't impact our lives. Behaviours feed behaviours; patterns of thought congeal and become difficult to break; fetishes are satiated and then transform into other, more bizarre fetishes.
I think people are naive to think that the basic laws of our world don't apply to the realm of the mental. You are what you think. I don't deny that I have some seedy elements in my psychology - I assure you I do, far more than I probably know - but I spend my time contemplating and trying to understand those elements, not feeding them. I think that is the only thing that distinguishes a man from an animal-man. The former contemplates and exercises his will; the latter is simply a tool for his lusts.
As for what I do with MY time, of course I waste it. But there are wastes and there are wastes. I think we can safely say that lusting after **** is not the same as what I do on here, or elsewhere for that matter.
As hard as it might be for you to accept this, I am not passing "judgment" on this bloke. The Christians rightly say that we're all "born into sin" - that is, we all basically suck. I am merely attempting to rebut the view that a woman SHOULDN'T feel upset upon learning that her partner or romantic interest spends a great deal of his time doing stupid things, however "private" the sphere of his activity might be.
No offense taken. I enjoy discussing these types of issues with others, and I've always admired your tact around here.
We have all farted at climax once, I'm sure.
My girlfriend and I have been on two double dates with this couple. The women dragged us into it, but me and the other boyfriend would chat and generally enjoy each other's company.
actually, no.
I understand what an analogy is, but not all analogies work. My point was that comparing the two acts is pointless. It would be -- to use an analogy of my own -- like saying swating a mosquito is comprable to shooting your neighbor. It just simply isn't by any reasonable measure.
You really think that? You have a much more idealistic view of humanity than I. He's turned on by fecal matter - an easily available, almost free, mass-produced substance. It's not like he fantasizes about his wife being raped by "a pack of naggers" or sex with horses or another thing hard to obtain in reality.
What about **********a? That's a victimless act, and you cant argue anything against it other than throwing your hands in the air and saying "That's just wrong."
^what about animal **********a?
Their friends and family would get upset, too. Just ask PETA.
I really wish I could find the video of Robert Schimmel doing a dead animal ******* bit in his act.