No Man Walks Alone one of our oldest sponsors owned and operated by one of the most discerning buyers I know, is right now offering up to 50% off on their winter sale. Browse their extensive selection of mesnwear, shoes and accessories, and get something truly special, like this special collaboration Western style shirt by G. Inglese in a rich, thick, and luxe brown cotton moleskin, with subtly contasting yellow snaps
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
I choose neither option.
I would consider voting it this poll if you would change the second choice to:
Reflect the wearer's idiosyncrasies and phallique.
You weren't joking . . .
I think clothing is about self-actualisation - moving towards being comfortable with who you are and being happy putting that out there for others to see. Now, for some, that involves idealisation towards a classical ideal of proportion. For others it's about deliberately echoing their own figure as closely as possible. Both are legitimate approaches... IF the wearer is doing it for the RIGHT reason (they enjoy how they look in the mirror wearing it), not in order to achieve some externally defined ideological purity of approach.
Spoken like a true psychiatrist. And spoken well, if I may say so. When is the book coming out? The last time someone published anything authoritative on the psychology of dress was a long time ago. I believe it was Flugel in the psychoanalysis age - back in the 1930's or so.