Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by Manton, Jul 30, 2012.
walking is for plebs.
When you wear EGs, G&Gs, and JLs you just hover along the ground.
so, foo, if wearing the shoes below, one would either need to have a skin tone different than the shoe, or wear socks. however, to go sock-less, and have a skin tone similar to the shoe, would then be in bad taste?
i just want to make sure i understand you correctly.
no, when you are a non-pleb, you do not walk. you are carried or driven.
Dare I question whether Foo is hellbent on non-matching socks because he is trying to compensate for the overwhelming blandness of his collection of Oneshoe's?
Not in a way that allows anyone to see my socks. Maybe I need a new walk--
The OneShoe, a Plaza-lasted #8 cordovan longwing, is inherently unbland.
The two of you suck real hard. I mean, REAL hard. You both obviously have some deep-seated self hate or unresolved issues within. Stop pushing your personal inferiority on others. There. I said it. Now go somewhere and do something. Weirdos.
The circle is now complete
Any updated shots of the collection? Would be nice to see how they've aged.
Evenly would be my guess.
As a previous non-participant in this fascinating discussion, please allow me to interject a question out of sincere curiosity: Why do you consider brown socks with navy trousers a legitimate option?
You never know when you'll need to start a fire.
Separate names with a comma.