Which brand do you find the most annoying?

Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by SirGrotius, Feb 10, 2011.

  1. GoldenTribe

    GoldenTribe Senior member

    Messages:
    3,673
    Likes Received:
    1,969
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2010
    Good point, my complaints regarding Dior will be retracted. Simple logic says - if Dior dont fit, dont buy or complain about them.
    You're allowed to complain about anything you want, just complain rationally. [​IMG] If the fit is way off for you, the fit is way off. But don't say the brand makes "loud" clothing because it doesn't fit you, you can't really mean that after saying you love the way a lot of it looks and trying to buy pieces.
     


  2. Renfield

    Renfield Active Member

    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2010
    Usually, the ones I can't afford.
     


  3. Klobber

    Klobber Senior member

    Messages:
    2,272
    Likes Received:
    88
    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2010
    Location:
    San Francisco
    But don't say the brand makes "loud" clothing because it doesn't fit you, you can't really mean that after saying you love the way a lot of it looks and trying to buy pieces.

    +1, I agree with you. My definition of loud included the notion of fit as well (not just colours, wavy fabrics or designs etc). Conclusion = my bad interpretation of the popular definition of loud.

    I actually heard a store rep tell me a pair of slim dark grey pants looked loud on me - reason being the front of the pants bulged my crown jewels out. So I assumed loud applied to fit / silhouette as well. My bad [​IMG]
     


  4. hymo

    hymo Senior member

    Messages:
    447
    Likes Received:
    20
    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2009
    Location:
    Hermes Man land


  5. turtleracer81

    turtleracer81 Member

    Messages:
    17
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2010


  6. BlueHorseShoe

    BlueHorseShoe Senior member

    Messages:
    523
    Likes Received:
    8
    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2008
    You're making this up 100%. There are great, luxe, visibly unbranded, beautifully fitting clothes from every designer listed in this thread at Holt Renfrew right now.

    "But that's what I see on the bus" is not the same as "but that's all the brand sells" -- and to conflate these two things, as LOTS of people in this thread have done, is beyond absurd.


    Why? If all I see from <name> is obnoxious logo crap, why can't that be grounds for annoying me? So HR sells a nice Gucci shirt. So what, I just saw some golden Gucci sneakers. It's obnoxious and annoying.

    The thread is "Which brand you find the most annoying" NOT: "Which brand only makes total shit"
     


  7. Mountains

    Mountains Senior member

    Messages:
    658
    Likes Received:
    10
    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2009
    TLDR: these guys made an ugly pair of shoes, now I cant shop there any more
     


  8. GoldenTribe

    GoldenTribe Senior member

    Messages:
    3,673
    Likes Received:
    1,969
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2010
    Why? If all I see from <name> is obnoxious logo crap, why can't that be grounds for annoying me? So HR sells a nice Gucci shirt. So what, I just saw some golden Gucci sneakers. It's obnoxious and annoying. The thread is "Which brand you find the most annoying" NOT: "Which brand only makes total shit"
    You're right, if everything you see from the brand pisses you off I guess you're allowed to be pissed off at the brand. What I would have liked to emphasize better is that it's not really the case that a bunch of logoed crap gets dumped on North American department stores and then one boutique in Ukraine gets the three nice runway pieces that were actually produced. There are lots of nice pieces by almost every major brand almost every season. So if you hate them because you see their worst stuff, it's a legitimate reason to hate them, but it's NOT a legitimate basis upon which to state that everything they make is garish crap. It's definitely too bad that the over-branded, aspirational rubbish gets the most visibility.
     


  9. BlueHorseShoe

    BlueHorseShoe Senior member

    Messages:
    523
    Likes Received:
    8
    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2008
    Absolutely. It is a shame.
     


  10. Rosecity

    Rosecity Active Member

    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    21
    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2008
    I hate Zara's tendency to make something almost nice, then add in a ridiculous extra detail like fake leather.

    This is so true. I bought a jacket when I visited a Zara in Chicago. Later when I was looking at it, I just kept wondering what the purpose of some of the details were. That's all they were, details, zippers the had no pocket.

    I heard the take clothes that don't sell and redesign them. Constantly trying to improve the design.
     


  11. Rayson

    Rayson Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    89
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2010
    Location:
    Bristol, England
    Why? If all I see from <name> is obnoxious logo crap, why can't that be grounds for annoying me? So HR sells a nice Gucci shirt. So what, I just saw some golden Gucci sneakers. It's obnoxious and annoying.

    The thread is "Which brand you find the most annoying" NOT: "Which brand only makes total shit"


    That's the thing. Brands that produce some decent or nearly decent stuff among the truly awful often annoy me even more than ones that produce nothing but crap.
     


  12. gateslion

    gateslion Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    81
    Likes Received:
    3
    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    Kenneth Cole
    John Varvatos
    Hugo Boss


    +1 on the Hugo Boss.

    While I generally realize that its kind of unfair and shortsighted to hold a company accountable today for the actions of its owners in the past, I just can't possibly see myself buying Boss, once I learned that the actual Hugo Boss was a straight up, dyed in the wool, card carrying Nazi who used POW slave labor to work in his factories producing uniforms for the SS. Yeah, won't be buying any Boss. Thanks.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugo_Boss#History


    Also, affliction and ed hardy, just because they suck and are ugly.
     


  13. NewYorkBuck

    NewYorkBuck Senior member

    Messages:
    482
    Likes Received:
    13
    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2004
    Ken Cole
    Versace
    A&F - the original owners are rolling over in their graves at what the brand had become.....
     


  14. gio3969

    gio3969 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    58
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2009
    +1 on the Hugo Boss.

    While I generally realize that its kind of unfair and shortsighted to hold a company accountable today for the actions of its owners in the past, I just can't possibly see myself buying Boss, once I learned that the actual Hugo Boss was a straight up, dyed in the wool, card carrying Nazi who used POW slave labor to work in his factories producing uniforms for the SS. Yeah, won't be buying any Boss. Thanks.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugo_Boss#History


    Also, affliction and ed hardy, just because they suck and are ugly.


    You are honestly citing war affiliations from three generations ago as a reason for not buying a suit. Wow. I really cannot think of a worse reason.

    -100000000000
     


  15. Fuuma

    Fuuma Franchouillard Modasse

    Messages:
    25,915
    Likes Received:
    10,524
    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2004
    Ralph Lauren
     


Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by